|
Originally Posted by liliangrn
Infinity is described as bad mathematics. I believe that most physicists would much prefer to zero to infinity. At least then zero can be defined. Let me first state that zero is a rather antiquated notion, because, wherever we look expecting to find nothing, something always rears it's head. Even the much revered singularity remains rather elusive doesn't it? You cannot show me zero space, zero time, zero energy, zero anything, zero nothing or non-existence.
The universe once thought to be a vacuum has now been found to be full of stuff; mass, energy, radiation, waves, force, etc.
We can however experience infinity and not merely as a limit. Actual time and space, not in a relative sense, is infinite. Logically the universe could not be derived from nothing.
Infinity as a limit is a rather nice idea if you are into that kind of thing. i.e. defining everything finitely.
Physicists keep coming up with mathematical equations, in an attempt, to define BHs. Yet all attempts so far have produced infinite outcomes. (one zero outcome was produced, to my knowledge, but since black holes have mass and gravity this is not overly viable) My theory is not a statement that would cease all research into black holes. It's just a theory that is attempting to explain an undefinable phenomenom. At least I have a theory which is by no means unrealistic. The main problem with my theory is the word 'infinity'. It just seems to protrude bile from the mouths of mathematicians as if I had spoken a '*hush, hush*' dirty word.
Remember we came from infinity, we are surrounded by it, you cannot escape infinity and by all means we cannot ignore infinity indefinitely.
Josephineeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee... and so on
|
