Quote:
|
my execution times are good.
|
build in the timing function, store the system time before start in one var... you know the drill, then you'd have exact time of execution of your function, then run TM's program, compare the results on the same system, then you'd have the necessary data to back up your point
In any case his algorithm is not that great either take some 50-60 digit long number and it will take him years to get the results, if you are talking about factoring here is a few thoughts:
here's wikis on most commonly used factoring algorithms (I personally prefer gnfs although some curve factoring is needed in large numbers):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor...ion_algorithms
RSA's favorite algorithms:
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2190
and little something in the quantum world and Shor's algorithms:
http://ece.gmu.edu/crypto/student_projects/physics.htm
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
