Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 05-05-2005   #17 (permalink)
Tormod's Avatar
Tormod
Hypographer




Location:
Oslo, Norway
 
Tormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: The Theory of Special Relativity for the Totally Confused Beginner

Josephine, before I ban you for being endlessly obnoxious, please try to straighten your brain out for a second.

Special relativity is a theory. As a theory it is coherent and the predictions it makes were revolutionary and infuriating at the time, yet today they are becoming more and more understood.

As a theory, it makes perfect logical sense. That is why it was one of the major innovations in human history.

However, Einstein's theories are very difficult to understand.

Look at it this way: it is easy to learn how to drive a car (for most people, at least). But it is extremely difficult to build one yourself. You can take it apart, yet it wouldn't instantly become clear to you what each part does, why they are were they are, or even what they are needed for in the first place.

So it is with scientific theories - you study what has been done before, try to understand it. A theory may make more or less sense to each and every one of us, but there are rules for how a theory must be constructed, just like there are certain ways a car needs to be built in order to work.

These things are, for example, coherence, logic (ie, A required B, so we need to have B which then requires C, or even A1 etc), testability (we must be able to test out the car, but also each part of it).

Yet we may not have a complete understanding of how the car is constructed, nor can we construct our own. But we can study it and learn. We can appreciate it for the practical uses it has. But it is still just a car.

The same goes for a scientific theory. As long as it follows the requirements of proof, validity, logic and testability, it is accepted as a theory and can make perfect logical sense. We don't have to understand it to accept this.

In fact, this is the very reason there are things like peer reviewed journals, scientific societies etc - so that people can submit theories and have them thoroughly tested by *many* others. When this is doen, we accept the new theory as a theory. Nobody is saying it is the only truth or even that it is necessarily correct. But it is, at the time, the best way to describe what we observe.


----------------
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator

Want to lose the advertisements? Become a Sponsor!

Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network