Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 05-17-2004   #4 (permalink)
sundog's Avatar
sundog
Thinking


Location:
UK
 
sundog is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE:Science, good or bad?


Science in itself can be a very good thing. There are BIG problems though. Like the way we handle our discoveries and knowledge. We often try to run before we can walk. i.e. we identify benefits and uses of a new discovery and implement them before we fully understand or are even aware of the implications. For example DDT, Thalidomide, Nuclear waste and bombs etc.

Also, most of our knowledge of science has only been around for a relatively very short time. The benefits we have gained, have come all too quickly and allowed our numbers to grow at an astounding rate. Our presence in large numbers has made quite an impact on life on Earth. As I understand it, it has been estimated that since 1970, approximately 30% of biodiversity has been lost. Partly, if not largely, due to the effects of mankind.

I see ethical issues involved with our rate of benefits. Let's take medicine as one example-

Would you deny you son, daughter or other loved one, LIFE SAVING treatment?
Of course not!

What if it meant a few animals suffered a little discomfort?
Probably still no question, it means saving a loved one.

How about if it meant some animals actually die?
You may still go ahead but feel a little uncomfortable.

Now, what if it meant a complete species became extinct? Or MANY species?
Hmmm...

As I look a the big picture, this is what I see happening. OK, saving ones life does not directly relate to extinction of species. But in effect, trying to cure all ills and saving every human life you can, is ONE FACTION that has led to our boom in numbers. Thus the impact on biodiversity.

I am IN NO WAY saying we should refrain from using medical facilities. I am merely trying to point out that we have gained so much benefit through knowledge, in such a small time, it has had an effect on all life.

So if science had progressed very slowly, or we had dealt with the knowledge more carefully, then it would not have had such a negative effect. We have certainly had much benefit from science and it may even save the 'entire planet' one day.

There's much one can say, and many ways of looking at this topic, but I'll leave it at that for now.

Let's have some more views on it.


sundog


Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network