aah, well it took a little while to get any kind of response
thanks for both of your contributions, I'll try to answer your questions as best i can, obviously the details of the project (hydrogen recovery IGCC syngas)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by UncleAl
Are you insane? The pressure could be no less than 10^11 Pa or 15 million psi. Yer gonna generate and handle thousands of metric tonnes of hydrogen at 15 million psi and 800 C? HA HA HA!!!
|
afraid not quite so, hydrogen recovery from integrated gassification combined cycle systems using mixed protonic/electronic conductive membranes will provide
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ceramatec.com
high-pressure H2-rich gas (50-100 psi)
|
and to tell ya the truth i dont have any idea where you got your 15 million psi to start with... (perhaps long hard math equations, could you specify?)
Quote:
|
It would diffuse through solid steel.
|
ceramics can be much stronger and more durable then steel, and since INEEL is teaming up with Ceramatec Inc. (company that develops and pattents ceramic types) I'd imagine that the containers would be ceramic, and not steel.
Quote:
|
Does your calculator go that high?
|
I didnt attack you, take it easy, or is flaming the newest fad that i've missed, i merely posted a news article, its not like i invented the hydrogen recovery IGCC syngas (otherwise this post would have been a few more pages long with detailed explanations, and complicated math and things). As to my calculator, bc, does a few hundred thousand place calculations, so I'm all set...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CraigD
Because hydrogen, a tiny molecule that tends to leak past or through most containers
|
actually, that was and still is a huge issue, well, aside from the fact that US gov-t doesnt want anymore nuclear reactors that is...
Ceramatec actually thought of this, here's some info:
http://www.ceramatec.com/techareas/techa_controlled.php
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
