Science Forums 2

[Freethinker]

Originally posted by: alexander
In astral projection the conscious mind leaves the physical body and moves into the astral body. The astral body is one of seven subtle bodies we all have.

Seven bodies, three chins? Thanks, that explains the extra weight the scale keeps saying I have. I thought it was from eating too much!

Some people can astral project naturally. Others are afraid to leave the physical body and never are able to astral project. An alternative approach is remote viewing.

NO ONE has EVER been proven to actually have a physical out of body experience EVER!

In astral projection you remain attached to your physical body by a silver "umbilical type" cord. Some people see the cord and others do not.

"Silver threads and golden needles can not mend this heart of mine..."

At least he song is REAL. This other stuff is pure mental masterbation.

Remote Viewing is splitting your consciousness to experiencing events in two or more places at the same time and being aware of all experiences.

As reality is compromised of electromagnetic grid programs - the matrix - remote reviewing is in truth moving your consciousness from one grid to another.

Hahahaha... truly great! Now we find that the "Matrix" is also real. Take the yellow pill Neo!

But you have one part right!

reality is compromised

Yes this type nonsense does SERIOUSLY "compromise" reality.

It is well known that there are government projects involving trained remote viewers used to gain access to top secret information. This involves training but anyone can learn to do it. </p>

The US Military dropped their Remote Viewing research because after 20+ years of research THEY FOUND NOTHING! It was called "Stargate". Information from these tests show exactly what is wrong with media and science interfacing. Intitial researchers were anxious to PROVE RV actually existed. And their intial experiments showed it did. But the research was shown to be bogus, improperly structured, false ooutcomes. The research was rejected, but the rejection was not covered by the media, even though the intitial positive claims were.

Every time the researchers did a test, they found positive outcomes. ANd each time, outside review found the research to be tainted. And each time the previous research was then rejected, but the rejections were NEVER covered by the media.

So it was moved to outside orgs, such as SAIC (my sig other worked for them with a high level security clearance when she lived in CA) . SAIC published some reports showing a positive outcome. It turmed out they referenced the previously rejected research. And so on.

Ultimately in 1995 two independant researchers were called in to review the whole thing. One of them is Ray Hyman. He wrote an article with his results:

The Evidence for Psychic Functioning: Claims vs. Reality

Conclusions

... the claim for the existence of psi, we find that it relies on a handful of experiments that have been shown to have serious weaknesses after undergoing careful scrutiny, and another handful of experiments that have yet to undergo scrutiny or be successfully replicated. What seems clear is that the scientific community is not going to abandon its fundamental ideas about causality, time, and other principles on the basis of a handful of experiments whose findings have yet to be shown to be replicable and lawful.
http://www.csicop.org/si/9603/claims.html