|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Science Under Siege
The problem science has defending itself is connected to its own confused state. It one looks at medical reseach for example, one day something is bad the next day it is good. At least ID is steady in its overly simplified world. This onesided steadiness is appealling to the average person looking for general knowledge. One day an asteroid kills the dinsaurs now it is a suana effect, or a virus, aliens, too many cheese burgers. How can science support so many truths and illusions at the same time. The answer is jobs and money. The ID staff works for the same bennies for its truths and illusions. Science can't defend itself because it would be the kettle calling the pot black.
I believe there is truth in both sides. I think culture senses this and wants to put them both orientations side by side for the children. What I hope the children get out of it is an attitude leading to an orderred design with a scientific explanation. The god of randomness needs an overhaul, because it is turning science into entertainment.
|