Well, I am quite surprised at the complete lack of any response to my last post. It seems to me that the fact that any explanation of anything can be interpreted in such a manner as to be a solution of the equation attached to that post is absolutely astounding for many different reasons.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Doctordick
I started this all by suggesting it would be attaching numbers to meanings and then looking at internal relationships [color=-red]implied by mathematical processes[/color]. Now that we have attached those numbers, let's look at some implied relationships.
...
We arrive at one and only one conclusion: the derivative of P((x1+a,[tau]1), (x2+a,[tau]2), ... (xn+a,[tau]n), t) with respect to a is zero.
|
Either no one here found that astounding or no one here found my arguments that it is true valid. In either way, I would sure like to here some clarification of the issue. There is a lot more down that road yet to be seen.
Have fun -- Dick
Knowledge is Power
and the most common abuse of that power is to use it to hide stupidity
