Good post.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by John Calvert
Most scientists agree that these systems look designed, but claim that the appearance of design is just an illusion that can be explained away by natural selection.
|
It's statements like this that shows the endless arrogance of certain parts of the ID movement.
Who are "most scientists"? I can accept that *some* scientists will say that the systems in question look designed, but to jump from there to include "most", and then categorically state that they will blame it on "natural selection" is laughable.
It simply shows what we already know - that the ID movement has a huge problem with evolution and want to prove that if something else isn't 100% proven then ID must be correct, and evolution can only be explained by accepting ID.
