Oh absolutely, Buffy, i know that dynamic tree management has been around, but did you actually read through the notes on that guy's dancing trees, they dont just ballance themselves, i can write a tree to do that infact i need to do it with threaded trees for next thursday, it is crazy in the way it acts to optimize itself for search, they are not ballanced and there is a long explanation why they are faster then ballanced trees, I know the concept is old, but what isnt in SC world, but what this guy is doing is absolutely mind boggling....
If you read throught this:
http://www.namesys.com/v4/v4.html#tree_design
you'll know what i mean when you finish
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
