|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Explain Mass.
I agree Kamil.. But I suppose I assumed most everyone knew what mass and matter was.
But now that we have mass defined.. Explaining it is another thing.
If a 'particle' of which makes up matter has what we refer to as mass. Then as we begin disecting that particle to the smallest part then the smallest part in that part we will wonder where it is we arrive at what is the 'source' of mass if it is we assume mass is a make up of fundemental particles. But if we do not expect a particle to be the cause of mass and instead, it is the space in which the detected particle exists within that causes the effect of mass then we wonder what is the 'space' that causes these forces and phenominas of nature.
If all was one at some astounding fundemental level it would be possible that anything interacting with-in this one would follow such a expected behavior of the mass in nature. Where anything that forces with-in this one will have the rest of itself being forced upon...
Then we have the assumption as time as a dimension and when objects/disturbances change or accelerate with-in this dimension it traverses through the 'scale' of the time flow and runs literaly into a dimensional resistence that all of which exists is tied into.
This of course is as good as anyones guess and I am more or less ranting on the go more than stating any kind of factual information in hopes to jazz up the imaginations and inspiration in others..
I will be posting my thoughts aswell, but I really enjoy reading other peoples ideas and respect them .. so more the better!
|