Quote:
|
I cannot understand why you all think that your that your personal comprehension of time (that diary of experiences you have constructed) must map faithfully over all of the supposed experiences of others. That very concept implies the existence of a universal time which is a direct contradiction of experiment. As I see it, the concept "time" only makes sense as a personal organizational parameter of our experiences. Please, persuade me that I am wrong
|
There are a few reasons.
According to some science theory time is a dimension that existence resides within.
Anything that experiences time, changes. Anything that experiences time has mass. Anything that experiences time is mattter and has gravity.
ANything that does not experience time does not change. It does not have mass. It is only energy, and it travels at an apparent constant to all other things that experience time.
This in my own opinion causes me to conclude time has a singularity point of zero time flow and a rest velocity time flow (which is faster and what we seem to experience in respect to considering the theory of relativity), relative and related to the constant of C and other constants found in nature.
If this is true the zero-point-field , or zero-point is the posistion of light and the dimension visual of where frozen time is in a 3d manner.
This is where time becomes a topic of confusing explanation.
There are different ways to refering to time.
Time is a thing we feel in our consciousness.
but in a scientific theory it is also a dimension that affects the workings of the universe.
The grand answer lies in answering,
Is the velocity of light REALLY a constant?
Is time dialtion truly a correct explanation of calculations made in special relativity and test data, or a phenomina explained with different reasons and logic?
And a few more obviously.
I believe there could be an interesting equation written from the observations I made before that. Light does not experience a flow in time (in its internal workings) and matter does. Which results in mass and no mass, change and no change. Something very useful if not already considered, lies in there.
