| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Trouble ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | this one's for you Arkain 101. ![]() ![]() dark matter is not matter at all. it is a gravity wave phenomenon of standing and/or soliton waves, antipodally focused in space by the curvature of space-time from a distant physical system and/or systems. think gravity super storms. get it? that's all i got. ![]() ---------------- Cynic, n: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. ~Ambrose Bierce ![]() | |
| ||
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Resident Slayer | ![]() Wow. A standing wave. Who'da thunk? Where's Krazy George when you need him, ![]() Buffy ---------------- "If you do not agree with anything I say, I'll not only retract it, but deny under oath that I ever said it!" __________________________________________________ ______________-- Tom Lehrer "The shrinks diagnosed me a sociopath with paranoid delusions. But they’re just out to get me cause I threatened to kill them." Forum Administrator Hypography Science Forums - Science for Boys and Girls! Its not for nothing that we hang out here. | |
| ||
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Resident USSRian | Re: wave goodbye to dark matter The real question is, will that standing wave move a surf board? ---------------- And remember that great question that Pierre-Simon Laplace and Sir Isaac Newton, Andrei Markov and David Hilbert, Richard Feynman and Enrico Fermi, Albert Einstein and Edmund Halley did not come to ask throughout all of their dedication and work: "Who the hell is IMing me?" This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. ![]() | |
| ||
| | #4 (permalink) | ||
| Trouble ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
![]() ---------------- Cynic, n: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. ~Ambrose Bierce ![]() | ||
| |||
| | #5 (permalink) | ||
| Resident Bright | Re: wave goodbye to dark matter Quote:
I agree, there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. I'm usually an optimist, but I fail to see how modern cosmology can reconcile empirical thermodynamic issues (and other physical issues) with the canonical hot big bang cold dark matter kooky energy theory. Maybe I simply have not yet been enlightened. Like my philosophy professor once said “I don’t doubt His existence, but I’m still waiting for His arrival.” NOT. CC ---------------- Coldcreation | ||
| |||
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Creating | Re: wave goodbye to dark matter Dark Matter Theorem : As all theories, this one is also described in many forms and types of analogies and similar expressions. "Dark" as it were means nothing for the attributes of matter, as it is known that all matter is dark...as in, unseen, though some energies originate from some positions of matter at frequencies of such that are capable to jumble electrons in our eyeballs that derives the counter-concept of dark of which is light. However, obviously it is more than just our eyes involved in the measurements and observations of these lack-there-of energy positions. All our devices are rendered incapable to detect any kind of tangible evidence to describe or define the source of these blurred and dark locations of space, ah but also, 'time'. "Wave" goodbye to that which we do not see, hear, smell, etc ehh? ![]() Wave to god why don't you ![]() A gravity wave phenominon..... Interesting..ging..ing... Energy is equal to change and mass... or time and matter.. Scratching the E then must have a mathatmical consequence of that particular equation. One of which I am far to out of pratice to bother attempting to demonstrate at this time. One thing I know that makes matter matter, is the fact that matter "hits", "contacts" or if you prefer, interacts in an equal opposite manner amongst eachother. This is something we should look for and for not in these dark matter regions of space and time. Intuitively guessing, a location of distance and linear past time, which demonstrates the capabilites to absorb without emitting or block without exposing itself, simply only needs to be defined as a time space distorted , space-time region. We ask, what is at the hypothetical edge of a universe when assuming there is a size and plausible position? Is it possible to inquire the lack of universe similar to the dark matter theoretics? These are questions that fly out of my brain.. for now.. and here.. well.. I don't even recall the past statements I may or may not have made on the subject of dark matter in the past, enlighten me if possible... ![]() | |
| ||
| | #8 (permalink) | |||
| Trouble ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() So as I understand it, dark matter and energy are the names given to unyet observed 'stuff' that is nonetheless making its presence known through measurement of what we can see and how fast it is all flying apart. That is, something is exerting a universal gravitational force that is holding stuff together longer/stronger. Now further I understand that gravity makes waves. While not complete by one dimension, we can use waves on a pond as an analogy. On a still pond, throw in a big rock, wait, then throw in another of the same size. As the waves spread they start to interfere with each other and some cancel when trough meets crest and some amplify when crest meets crest or trough meets trough. A toy boat floating in this pond will bob up and down accordingly, but by & large stay in its position. Some of the bobs are higher and lower than either individual wave can effect on their own. So the waves transfer energy (our gravity) from the rock (our 'stuff') through the water (our space) and apply it to the boat (our other 'stuff'). My idea then is that gravity waves may interfere with each other as they emanate from mass bodies and that the interference affects other mass bodies gravitationally as if they were actually near other mass bodies. I'm having way too much fun with this...now see what you started. How'd I do? ![]() ---------------- Cynic, n: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. ~Ambrose Bierce ![]() Last edited by Turtle; 09-19-2007 at 11:02 PM. | |||
| ||||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cold and Hot Dark Matter | kingwinner | Astronomy and Cosmology | 3 | 05-18-2007 08:13 AM |
| 'dark matter' | chendoh | Physics and Mathematics | 2 | 03-21-2007 06:59 AM |
| Dark Matter | teravore | Astronomy and Cosmology | 7 | 07-13-2006 04:04 AM |
| Dark Matter | C1ay | Astronomy and Cosmology | 41 | 10-28-2005 09:57 AM |
| Substitute to Dark Matter? | fatty_ashy | Astronomy and Cosmology | 88 | 10-20-2004 02:04 AM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:56 PM.











it is a gravity wave phenomenon of standing and/or soliton waves, antipodally focused in space by the curvature of space-time from a distant physical system and/or systems. think gravity super storms.
get it? that's all i got. 
Cynic, n: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. ~Ambrose Bierce 










How'd I do? 






