|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: What is REINCARNATION really anyway??
Reincarnation is the ancient version of genetic theory, but with an extra feature that genetic theory has yet to bring to awareness. What is recycled after death are the genetics that are passed forward to the children. So when you die, one is more less or less, reborn as one's genes move forward to the future through generations.
The concept of Karma and reincarnation, where reincarnation will be dependant on what one has done in this life can be understood with an example. Say one smokes too much. This may cause genetic damage. The next generation may get this damage, passing it forward.
The idea of coming back as a lower life form can also be understood with an example. Say you were born into a family of 100 pound weaklings. Instead of accepting that fate, one goes to the gym and gains a lot of muscle mass to become 220 pounds of ripped muscle. Since genetics may not become altered very much in one lifetime, the genes passed forward will still be those of the 100 pound weakling family. As such, one will may come back as a fly, or the genes passed forward will appear to regress.
The randomness of reincarnation, where one can come back as anything is analogous to the genetic mutation possibilities that can occur on top of the normal forward motion of genes from one generation to another.
There is also one last possibility. After all reincarnation, the chain is finally broken, where reincarnation ends. What this suggests is mind over matter, where the mind is stronger than genetics. Or the mind is having an impact on the genetics thereby superseding reincarnation. The genetics evolve within the individual, instead of needing to pass forward to be able to evolve. The genetic theory has demonstrated all of the above except the last. I would guess that eventually genetic theory will evolve. For now genetic theory is stuck within the old fashion reincarnation loop.
If you look at the Eastern philosophies from which reincarnation came, their path of enlightenment required detachment from the illusions of reality, as they put it. In other words, they would cut off exterior sensory data and all the social subjectivity that this could induce, to collect interior data. If their hunches were correct, tapping into the high areas of the brain is what they felt would allow the individual the power to alter genetics. The exterior data collection is what animals do, so they assumed one had to go by a path that the animals are not able to go, to be able to supersede genetics. If one looks at the mystic that can stop his heart this requires one be able to move their consciousness to part of the brain, very few can reach. It takes a lot of inward focus or meditation. If one is looking outward a babe in a bikini will cause the heart to start racing again, due to a sensory type induction that is partially culturally conditioned and partially instinctive.
|