|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: 5th Dimension theory
If you cover one eye, we will lose depth perception. To compensate the one eye has to shift back and forth to simulate 3-D. If humans only had one eye, the third or z-axis would be somewhat fuzzy. It would need to be modeled conceptually and mathematically, since although it does exist, the one eye is having problems with clarity. The math would create a way to visualize this third dimension within the imagination, to assist with the limitation of this particular sensory system. This is where mental constructs are important. These would emulate a second eye or mind's eye, i.e., in the imagination.
With two eyes we can see much better in 3-D, but looking at the fourth dimension of time also has a perceptual problem for this particular sensory system. We needed to develop the math and the concepts of time or the 4th-D, to allow us to see reality using 4-D, with much of the processing done within the imagination's virtual eye, to assist the limitations of just two eyes. This gives us three eyes, one virtual, to see 4-D.
I suppose we could also add mental constructs and math for 5-D and orientate the mind within the imagination using two mind's eyes or two virtual eyes. But without any of these mental constructs, two eyes only sees 3-D with certainty. Under these primitive conditions the mind would still try to fill in 4-D, with trial and error data. One can still throw the spear at the animal moving in space-time, even without understanding time. This empirical data was later made more rational, due to the efforts of science, replacing the uncertainty with a cleaner mental construct for 4-D.
|
