Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Alternative theories
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-27-2008   #11 (permalink)
Pluto's Avatar
Suspended


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Cosmilogical Theory

G'day Arkain

What has this got to do withthe price of eggs?
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008   #12 (permalink)
jerrygg38's Avatar
Thinking


Location:
Cary North Carolina
 
jerrygg38 is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Cosmilogical Theory

Quote:
Originally Posted by arkain101 View Post
Okay, going from this I think I can explain a point I was trying to make quite clearly.

Because of these sections of reality. Such a theory as Einsteins Special Relativity may very well only explain the observed world. However, if we declare that the two sections are true and correct, then we can use them to declare further, that the observed world is not infact the same as the tangible world of the present "here" and "now". A study of observation behaviors and not a satisfactory theory for studying material events at extremes. Using strictly and centerally SR's model of reasoning, it may not be possible to accurately understand the functions at the quantum level.

It may be possible that this dichotomy of reality I am trying to bring to light at the macrocopic level exposes itself even at the quantum level, and thus to our "MINDS" it at first appears quote "unreasonable" or "strange and crazy".

If we understand how our minds can think we may understand why we think ( conclude) what we do in certain experiments and observations.


Now, this is all said in a suggestive manner which I tried to do on purpose.

I propose for the attempt to begin to answer the question of what all these suggestive thoughts could actually officially conclude?

Good thoughts. As you look at the value of special relativity, you see Einstein related the world of space and time to what we ordinary think. Everything he quotes is respect to our own bodies. Thus we view the world from our reference plane.

SR is wrong because the Michelson/Morely experiment was invalid. The gravitational field of the Earth causes the light speed in all directions to adjust to light speed Earth Ce. Thus the instrument could not measure anything other than equal light speed in all directions.

The brilliant mind of Einstein related to world to his mind. You get the same equations from the Doppler.

M(forward) = Mo (C/(C-V)
M(rear) = Mo (C/(C+V)
M(RMS) = Mo / [1-(V/C)^2]^0.5

thus Einstein is Root mean square Doppler. His answers are beautiful because they are RMS Doppler.

the distance formulas for RMS Doppler are

L(RMS) = Lo [(1-(v/c)^2]^0.5

T=To [1-(V/C)^2]^0.5

The Michelson/Morley experiment is invalid because the gravitational field of the Earth reduced the speed of the photons to our light speed as they traveled from the sun to us.

Now why do we think of an infinite light speed reference plane and instantaneous interactions? Because we exist in a multi-light speed universe. Althought Einsteins reference plane ideas are excellent, he did not understand that light speed goes from 0 to infinity in the total universe.

Another basic problem with Einstein was that he did not realize that his photons travel quantized distances. Thus my dots exist at 0 velocity, then they jump to light speed C. Then they stop and become mass dots. Then they jump to light speed C.

Thus the dots within the photons continually materialize and dematerialize. The electron for example has huge amounts of dots and they all jump from spot to spot as the electron moves. If all the dots move simultaneously the electron completely dematerializes. The probability is low of course but the electron beam will produce a distribution of spots.

The important thing is that once we only think from our own vantage point, we neglect to see the entire universe.

Your points are excellent from the position of an ordinary person who looks at the universe from inside himself. It is invalid from the point of view of a person who sees himself within the universe from outside the universe. That is the way I think. I always look at myself from outside myself. The world is different when you look at yourself from afar.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Theory of Everything, A Final Theory of Everything bochen2 Physics and Mathematics 1 10-19-2008 12:14 PM
My Theory Gardamorg Strange Claims Forum 2 05-28-2008 04:31 AM
S.S.W.A.P. theory Aireal Physics and Mathematics 10 08-16-2007 12:20 PM
Big Little Theory Bryan Kirby Astronomy and Cosmology 2 08-21-2005 11:48 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network