The Dominium Model: Part 2

[Eric]

The following issue you may well be aware of. Some months ago I was looking at what my astronomy books say about solar wind. They refer to Eugene Parker's 50's theory as a prediction for it and the explanation. From another forum, I know that your not keen on wikipedia, but its quite interesting to look at the solar wind entry there. His work was criticised at the time but then solar wind evidence turned up. Now apparently, Eugene Parker's theory is thought to be insufficient to fully explain observations -

'In the late 1990s the Ultraviolet Coronal Spectrometer (UVCS) instrument on board the SOHO spacecraft observed the acceleration region of the fast solar wind emanating from the poles of the sun, and found that the wind accelerates much faster than can be accounted for by thermodynamic expansion alone. ' wikipedia

So this seems to indicate an inadequacy (assuming the criticism's made of Eugene Parker's theory at the time don't hold up anyway). This leads on to a question I have about whether there is data that solar wind speed averages increase with distance from the sun.

One of my astronomy books seems to suggest this - but not clearly enough. But this would support gravitational repulsion.

[Hasanuddin]

Hi Eric,

Welcome. You bring up and excellent point/observation. Let us focus on the data actual observation (and not the theory that someone else surmised.) Yes, someone else did have a crack at explaining the evidence, but as you note, their explanation falls short. It is the physical evidence that is most important.

BTW, congratulations for figuring out the next moves, and that is that the escaping MPP’s are the drivers of the solar wind. You’re getting ahead of me, but I have never been one to avoid a direct question. Since you have preempted that move, let me summarize an overview of how that will happen:

MPP eventually escape the Sun’s surface (causing CME’s and twisted magnetic fields as they go. Some matter is pushed along in front of MPP. Continual nudging gives enough energy to also escape the Sun’s surface.

Now, we know (I believe confirmed by SoHo also) that the matter measured in the solar wind jumps from planet to planet of the equatorial ring of inner and outer planets. Within the ring of planets would also be away from where the MPP would want to travel. With fewer MPP drivers, the matter of the solar wind would not be accelerated as much as to more scarce matter remnant of the solar wind directly away from the poles.

The long and the short of your final question is "Yes, this observation does allign with a notion of gravitational repulsion."

In two moves your question will be given much more filling than I did just a moment ago. Please stay tuned. Also, tell as many people as you can about the ongoing, potentially pivotal, debate on this thread. There is more at stake than meets the eye.

[Hasanuddin]

Move 16

As the stream of positron MPP flow into inersteller space, they will continue to drive electrons along with them. Gravitational repultion would continue to accelerate the MPP, which in turn will accelerate the electrons. Because both the MPP and electrons will be traveling at similar relative speeds, conditions maintaining immiscibility would be expected to hold between these two types of particle packets.

The electrons would be accelerated by the MPP in two different ways.

Push from behind: Because of immiscibility, MPP can be considered discrete objects compared to the space occupied by electrons. The MPP would feel gravitational repulsion at first mainly from the star of origin, but that dominance would slowly be replaced by net gravitational repulsion from the overall galactic cluster; only to be later (a very long time later) replaced by dominance of gravitational attraction from the nearest like-type (antimatter) galaxy to which the MPP are heading. Therefore, the acceleration of the MPP will be “continuous” (given known conditions.) In a very similar manner the energies of the electrons being driven will also be increased, especially within the galactic cluster itself.

Pull from ahead: Although it was established that gravitational stability is a primary driver of a system in chaos, it was also established that once a system becomes gravitationally sorted, other forces with assert more dominant roles. Expected interaction between positively charged MPP and negatively charged driven electrons would be such an example. MPP are being accelerated out of a galaxy to achieve higher gravitational stablility. However, the charge differential between positrons and electrons will act to link the two. Therefore, the accelerated positrons will also drag trailing electrons thereby accelerating them to similar speed achieved by the positrons.

Near to the galactic center, this dynamics would be expected to accelerate out of a star’s bubbling matrix, launched into near space, pushed ever further by successions of MPP, pushed past the Sun’s influence and beyond. Could this process go on forever? The answer to that question is clearly no for many reasons. First and foremost, because of basic immiscibilty laws the MPP will be permitte to enter the neighboring galaxy, but the matter of the solar wind would never be allowed in.

Therefore, at some point the electrons would be halted and the positrons would flow on. In the other direction “anti-solar-wind,” it might be called, is being produced and is coming at us. From the anti-solar-wind the electrons will separate out and enter our galaxy’s dominium, while positrons for the anti-solar-wind would stay in the adjacent antimatter galaxy.

The net out come of the cumulative effects of both processes is a net separation of charge. Our galaxy is continuously loses (+) particles while retaining (-), at the same time we are gaining (-) from antimatter abutting dominia. Therefore as time goes on, the Universe is moving from a from an initial stable-state where charge was distributed evenly throughout the Universe, to a state were charge is becoming increasingly localized. This gradual, but continuous, process would be expected to move the system from the initial stable state through various forms of instability, to eventual collapse. This process would be analogous to the stages of development of a star as the process of fusion/antifusion change its gravitational dynamics slowly by changing its density. Potentially, this process can lead to system collapse to a black-hole. The relationship between these two systems is not just analogy, but an equivalency. Solar collapse is the gravitational equivalent for the predictor of the future electrical imbalances an increasing tensions across the entire matrix, leading to ultimate collapse, i.e., the next Big Bang.

[Eric]

Hasanuddin

Can you clarify the following:

MPP eventually escape the Sun’s surface (causing CME’s and twisted magnetic fields as they go. Some matter is pushed along in front of MPP. Continual nudging gives enough energy to also escape the Sun’s surface.

Now, we know (I believe confirmed by SoHo also) that the matter measured in the solar wind jumps from planet to planet of the equatorial ring of inner and outer planets. Within the ring of planets would also be away from where the MPP would want to travel. With fewer MPP drivers, the matter of the solar wind would not be accelerated as much as to more scarce matter remnant of the solar wind directly away from the poles.

From what I could remember, I get as far as MPP = Micellular, but P? P? (also CME ..).

[Hasanuddin]

Hi Eric,

Sorry for not being clear. The definition of MPP… okay, but again sorry, I am so close to this model that it’s easy to think that others are as familiar with the meaning, use, and significance of all of the acronyms used.

MPP: Micellular Positron Packets These are 3-dimensional spheroid structures formed within matter-based stars generating antimatter positrons as a byproduct of fusion. To achieve primary gravitational stability the antimatter positrons clump forming the MPP structure. The dynamic of the MPP would be highly similar to schooling fish: positrons will travel and move together, but are associating only loosely with each other and will part and merge again as a result of obstacles (cause by inherent gravitational repulsion with the resident objects in the solar system of creation.) Although all particles within MPP are electrically (+) they therefore feel electric repulsion with one another, therefore would not ever be expected to collide with one another while in transit. Even though there is electrostatic repulsion between members, the MPP stay in formation because the hierarchy of needs places primary gravitational stability (sorting into cordoned areas of matter vs antimatter) exceed electric conditions for stability.

I agree, the notion of MPP are quite complex at first glance. However, given further consideration and notice to tight ties to other aspects of nature for all the conclusions defining this concept, it seems quite backed up and clean.

[Eric]

Hasanuddin:

Even though there is electrostatic repulsion between members, the MPP stay in formation because the hierarchy of needs places primary gravitational stability (sorting into cordoned areas of matter vs antimatter) exceed electric conditions for stability.

I can see how positrons within solar wind being gravitationally repelled out from the sun could explain how fast solar wind is, but I have trouble seeing how this metaphor can be relied on when the electromagnetic force surpasses the gravitational by an order of 10^36. How can such gravitational positron concentration/repulsion of matter be significant relative to that?

[Moontanman]

Good news hasanuddin, the search for antimatter galaxies is on!

NASA - In Search of Antimatter Galaxies

[Eric]

Astonishing, apparently NASA's been reading 'The Dominium',
by Hasanuddin!

[modest]

Originally Posted by Moontanman

Good news hasanuddin, the search for antimatter galaxies is on!

NASA - In Search of Antimatter Galaxies

Excellent link!

Originally Posted by NASA

Other instruments such as the Italian PAMELA satellite have looked for anti-helium nuclei, but none have been sensitive enough to rule out the existence of antimatter galaxies. AMS has about 200 times the particle-collecting power of anything that has flown before. If AMS detects no anti-helium nuclei, Ting says scientists will know that there are no antimatter galaxies within about 1000 megaparsecs — or roughly to the edge of the observable universe.

To either rule out or find evidence of large cosmic antimatter bodies will be a great achievement. The ISS takes a lot of criticism from people who wish the money were spent on different endeavors, but they really are doing some invaluable and fascinating science there.

~modest