Big Bang(s)

Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools
Published by BrainForce 09-02-2006
Big Bangs - A theory or a misconception

I read and drowned in my ideas after reading the recent theory given by Neil Turok. I thought, what shortcomings it has or it will pose better answers for today's mysteries and thus I got to a conclusion after 7 days of research. How it can effect these objects and phenomenon.

Acc. to this concept, several big bangs, I will call it MBB happened in the universe, but they can't happen simultaneously, some of them might might have banged after and before 13.7 bill. limit, thus Mean time of explosions can be taken as 13.7 bill.yrs.

Expansion rate-
A plump solitary big bang can cause everlasting expansion that the MBB can't do. Since matter in universe in both the concepts is the same therefore we can say MBB might not have produced much expansion rate many expansions of different big bangs might have collided with one another further deteriorating acceleration.

Gamma Ray Bursts-
Now one big bang have much larger space for expansion in comparison with little ones. Now GRB's are known to be caused by primordial black holes i.e. Hypernovae in primordial nebulae. Now the question rises that which of these theories favour the existence of GRB's.

Now a solitary one have more mass, more matter, more speed thus you can't get superdense nebulae in one sight. But MBB accounts for less mass ,less speed and there it poses a possibility of such supermassive bodies.

Supermassive objects-
Clumps of hundred of galaxies formed by gravitational pull and collisions between objects of different big bangs can also solve the mystery of bodies like Quasars giving it a totally new concept.

Shape of Galaxies-
Abundance of elliptical and spiral galaxies shows that these creations can't be made by random explosions.

Size of Galaxies-
Size of galaxies can also pose to be strong favourer as MBB should have a large number of supermassive bodies (explained above)

Shape of the Universe-
The density is more than the critical density in such a case. Thus the shape of universe would be like one described in the case of density more than critical density.

Light Distortion--
The distortion or space time warp is more in case of MBB. Thus distortion is to such an extent that we aren't able to see objects beyond 12 bill. Light yrs., but we are able to see those objects with some less distortion and thus here is shortcoming of this concept.

Dark Matter-
The proportion of dark matter is much more in case of MBB due to abundance of massive objects. Thus in such types of universe Dark Matter (present in halo around galaxies) will be dominant force in the universe to such an extent that each galaxy will develop its black hole as soon as it can.

This is a personal opinion and a private one.
  #1  
By Tormod on 09-03-2006
Re: Big Bang(s)

I took the liberty to clean up your text slightly as I found the font size and bold type a bit difficult to read.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrainForce
thus Mean time of explosions can be taken as 13.7 bill.yrs.
I don't understand how you get to this conclusion. Since this is somewhat important to the entire purpose of the theory of MBB's, could you please elaborate on this point?
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Article Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
More than one Big Bang? chamilton333 Astronomy and Cosmology 46 05-07-2007
New Big Bang Evidence? C1ay Astronomy news 4 06-24-2006
Big Bang Michael Sipos Astronomy and Cosmology 9 04-07-2006
Big Bang spongehammer Astronomy and Cosmology 28 11-26-2005
what if big bang again?? Tim_Lou Philosophy and Humanities 5 01-06-2004


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
Powered by GARS © 2005-2008