 |
|
07-02-2008
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Percipient

Sponsor |
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Still no sunspots...
Nearly another month gone by since the first post here and still no spots. Well, there was 998 we looked at, but it was part of cycle #23 and dissapated. Then there was 999, but that did the same. I was going to post it and point out it's 666 if you stand on your head.  Anyway, its gone and the Sun is blank today. >> SpaceWeather.com -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids
Rather than a minimum however, it may be as MoonTan suggested,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MoonMan
Maybe the sun is holding back and will really kick our ass with a series of huge flares in a few months or years.
|
 :  Here is an article from our Hypography archive predicting an extreme cycle 24: >> http://hypography.com/forums/astrono...lar-cycle.html
 
----------------
 semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
|
|
09-03-2008
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Percipient

Sponsor |
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Still no sunspots...
It's the darndest thing! Who ya gonna call?
DailyTech - Sun Makes History: First Spotless Month in a Century
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Michael Asher
Drop in solar activity has potential effect for climate on earth.
The sun has reached a milestone not seen for nearly 100 years: an entire month has passed without a single visible sunspot being noted.
The event is significant as many climatologists now believe solar magnetic activity – which determines the number of sunspots -- is an influencing factor for climate on earth.
...
Article Update, Sep 1 2008. After this story was published, the NOAA reversed their previous decision on a tiny speck seen Aug 21, which gives their version of the August data a half-point. Other observation centers such as Mount Wilson Observatory are still reporting a spotless month. So depending on which center you believe, August was a record for either a full century, or only 50 years. ...
|
----------------
 semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
|
|
09-04-2008
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
meh.......
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Still no sunspots...
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonMan
Maybe the sun is holding back and will really kick our ass with a series of huge flares in a few months or years.
|
That's all right...Just so long as I get a heads up when it begins...every time the sun gets to goin good the northern lights are spectacular (they're always very pretty over the lake  and one of the few good things about living on the great lakes especially as winter approaches.)
----------------
Last edited by trained chimp #6
|
|
09-04-2008
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Percipient

Sponsor |
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Still no sunspots...
Quote:
Originally Posted by DFINITLYDISTRUBD
That's all right...Just so long as I get a heads up when it begins...every time the sun gets to goin good the northern lights are spectacular (they're always very pretty over the lake  and one of the few good things about living on the great lakes especially as winter approaches.)
|
Northern lights are not tied to sunspots, rather to CME's (Coronal Mass Ejections). There is in fact an aurora alert tonight. Keep looking up.  >> SpaceWeather.com -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids
----------------
 semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
|
|
09-04-2008
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
meh.......
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Still no sunspots...
I knew that 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonMan
Maybe the sun is holding back and will really kick our ass with a series of huge flares in a few months or years.
|
What I was happily noting is Bolded and underlined.
Thanks for the heads up
I imagine you've got one of them fancy solar filters?
I use my welding filters to check out the sun from time to time But sadly no longer own a telescope  and have never seen a spot 
----------------
Last edited by trained chimp #6
Last edited by DFINITLYDISTRUBD; 09-04-2008 at 06:50 PM..
|
|
09-04-2008
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Percipient

Sponsor |
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Still no sunspots...
Quote:
Originally Posted by DFINITLYDISTRUBD
I knew that  What I was happily noting is Bolded and underlined.
Thanks for the heads up 
|
 I did not know that!  My bad. 
----------------
 semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
|
|
09-04-2008
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
M.C. Grillmeister

Sponsor |
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Still no sunspots...
Quote:
Originally Posted by DFINITLYDISTRUBD
I use my welding filters to check out the sun from time to time But sadly no longer own a telescope  and have never seen a spot 
|
Quote:
|
Since looking directly at the Sun with the naked eye, through binoculars or a telescope is extremely dangerous, amateur observation of sunspots with the unaided eye is generally done by projection or via using proper filtration. Small sections of very dark filter glass, such as a #14 welder's glass is sometimes employed. The eyepiece of a telescope is also used in the role of a "projector" to project the image, without filtration, on to a white screen where it can be viewed indirectly, and even traced, so sunspot evolution can be followed.
|
Sunspot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
When I took Astronomy classes, we would track sunspots on a paper projection. We don't need SOHO to track sunspots on our own. 
----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
» Advertisement |
|
|
|