Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Astronomy and Cosmology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-23-2008   #1 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
Creating

Moderator

Location:
U.S. Midwest
 
modest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Deriving Gravitational Time Dilation as a Function of Potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by modest View Post
Using U, you can calculate the gravitational time dilation inside and outside the sphere:
T = \frac{T_0}{\sqrt{1-U/c^2}}
I had this wrong in a previous thread. The normal equation for gravitational time dilation is:
T = \frac{T_0}{\sqrt{1 - (2GM / rc^2)}}
Substituting U = GM/r actually gives:
T = \frac{T_0}{\sqrt{1 - (2U / c^2)}}
so I forgot the 2. My question is, does anyone know how to derive this time dilation as a function of potential equation? I was able to find two sources listing it:

Relativity: An Introduction to Space-time Physics, Steve Adams p.257
Relativity: An Introduction to Space ... - Google Book Search

Theoretical Concepts in Physics, M. S. Longair p.441 eq. 17.19
Theoretical Concepts in Physics: An ... - Google Book Search

But, nothing deriving it from GR. The reason I ask is I’m thinking of rewriting the "inside a sphere" part of:Gravitational time dilation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia which Craig and I proved was wrong in the thread quoted above. The idea is to find potential U using the equation for potential in a solid sphere and plug it into the equation above - that’s the right way to do it (I believe). But without deriving the equation above that has U in it, or a source explaining why it’s correct, I’d feel uncomfortable changing wikipedia

I would add that Wiki being wrong there has caused problems not only on this forum, but others as well.

I thought I’d throw this out there in case anyone has any ideas.

-modest


----------------
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008   #2 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
Creating

Moderator

Location:
U.S. Midwest
 
modest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Deriving Gravitational Time Dilation as a Function of Potential

I have successfully found some sources. Here's a fun one:

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einstein...jw/2006AJP.pdf

So, I will set about changing the article...

~modest


----------------
Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008   #3 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
Creating

Moderator

Location:
U.S. Midwest
 
modest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Deriving Gravitational Time Dilation as a Function of Potential

In case anyone is interested, I've taken to rewriting the entire article. My version so far is here:
User:JModest/Sandbox - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The original (which has multiple errors and poorly written language) is here:

Gravitational time dilation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I haven't yet started sections on definition, history, experimental confirmation... etc.

Any suggestions / corrections are most welcome. Layout, formulas, language, concept.. any suggestions you've got.

~modest


----------------
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008   #4 (permalink)
jedaisoul's Avatar
Understanding


Location:
England, UK
 
jedaisoul is a splendid one to beholdjedaisoul is a splendid one to beholdjedaisoul is a splendid one to beholdjedaisoul is a splendid one to beholdjedaisoul is a splendid one to beholdjedaisoul is a splendid one to behold
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Deriving Gravitational Time Dilation as a Function of Potential

Quote:
Equivalence Principle

...In 1915 Einstein published a completely relativistic theory of gravity (general relativity) consequent the equivalence principle which is now the most common tool for calculating gravitational time dilation.
Just to note that my copy of Einstein - The Principle of Relativity dates Einstein's paper "The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity" to 1916, not 1915. The full credit was:
Translated from "Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitatstheorie," Annalen der Physik, 49, 1916.

It should be relatively simple to check the date of that publication (no pun intended).

Last edited by jedaisoul; 06-25-2008 at 04:22 AM..
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008   #5 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
Creating

Moderator

Location:
U.S. Midwest
 
modest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Deriving Gravitational Time Dilation as a Function of Potential

Thank you jedaisoul. I've changed that section significantly which probably hasn't updated yet. Einstein published two papers in November 1915 on GR, the second of which had the completed field equations and is often cited. He also published more than one in 1916 that dealt with GR, so that is probably what you have.

List of scientific publications by Albert Einstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I appreciate the proof.

~modest


----------------
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
derivation, dilation, general, gravitational, potential, relativity, time


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How time dilation occurs kalesh Physics and Mathematics 61 03-29-2007 10:26 AM
Why time dilation? DrProctopus Physics and Mathematics 40 09-27-2005 02:16 AM
Time Dilation kamil Physics and Mathematics 60 08-15-2005 07:10 AM
Time Dilation: When v = c adjective Physics and Mathematics 26 07-20-2005 09:37 AM
Forever time dilation!?! matrixscarface Physics and Mathematics 19 03-09-2005 02:41 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:16 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network