 |
|
01-13-2009
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Creating
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
A solar flare contains a lot of energy to push all the way from the core of the sun to beyond the surface. This is also true of an explosive ejection of matter often seen happening within emerging stars. The question was, what is the simplest way to get a powerful pulse of energy, but in a localized way, instead of a uniform way like a supernova? A supernova ejects matter but everywhere at the same time. This mechanism is not specific enough for a localized matter ejection.
I used to work in a lab that had an explosion wall, which was a wall designed to be weaker than the rest of the concrete bunker. It was designed to direct an explosion into the parking lot, if there was the unlikely event of an explosion. If all the walls had the same strength, the explosion would be uniform and could take out the office building and the parking lot. The idea of fuel diffusion limitation and a local fuel surge satisfies the requirements. Where fuel diffusion finds a breech and floods the super heated core, there is also a weak spot. That is where the building will blow out to release the energy.
This thinking seemed to indicate a protective bunker around the primary fusion core but with blow out windows. One way to do this is with heavier atoms. But the traditional thinking says heavier atoms will sink and not float and therefore not form a barrier. The needed requirement was partial ionization, to create a hollow around dense nuclei because of restricted electron space. The result is analogous to a ship's hull, so heavy nuclei can float on top of lighter. If we assume a local fuel surge followed by a localized explosion, I called this fusion hammer. This explosive hammer will blow out a wall for an localized explosion ejection. The result was sun I knocking out a big wall, with the concrete bunker still standing to form sun II and the planets.
|
|
01-13-2009
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
hmm
i was pondering the fact that the impetali process creating gravity may have a hole
the relation ship of the time being ether to m/am pairs would be an issue
until i realized that the electron shell has a very large distance to the nucleus
so the intense magnetic field would be at the core
and at the edge of the atoms electron shell
the amount of magnetism would be alot less
similar to the point where you hold 2 magnets and you can feel an attraction
then you get to the edge of that point and that is the edge of the electron shell
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-13-2009 at 11:01 PM..
|
|
01-14-2009
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
http://www.nasa.gov/mov/299642main_C...ple_sm_web.mov
wow according to this the hydrogen that is affected by the reaction
is several light years away from the reaction, and moving,
i wonder if the hydrogen was present or moving,
or this is the photons and electrons (lightning?)
actually being recorded in frame rate
like timing a runner around a track
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
01-15-2009
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
now a nuetron would be the ether that change to a magnetically nuetral state
instead of going through the impetali process, it mutated to neither
m/am, but instead a combination of both
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-16-2009 at 09:01 PM..
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
now take plutonium
At this level of matter plutonium is semi-stable (depending on the isotope).
So the impetali process is going on, although, the electron shell is not enough to stabalize it fully.
Where hydrogen is stablized because the impetali process is at a nuetral state.
As plutonium decays, and shoots nuetrons, it replaces them through destablization
of the the next plutonium atom (half life).
Impetali changes to radiation and nuetrons.
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-16-2009 at 09:27 PM..
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
In which case, plutonium would be the decay of
my theoretical element, (188 plus),
that would have inherent very strong magnetic properties.
These would be on the level exponential in intensity, away from any element we currently have, use, and understand.
This element could theoretically bend space time,.
(no availible data on this element)
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-16-2009 at 09:30 PM..
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Creating
Location: neither here nor there ;)
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
Belovelife, that was certainly interesting.....you need to elaborate in your post instead of just putting in a link. Might I suggest, proofing that copy in Wiki?
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Explaining
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Gravity and a giant gas cloud
I would, but I don't know how. I am in the process of learning how right now.
It says something about outside resources, this is where i theorized it.
But i don't have clout to publish my work, i am at an impass.
[edit]
i could use some help with proofs and stuff though
formatting, etc.
----------------
lets start a vote, all those in favor of my posts being more stuctured, say I, all opposed say nay, you can pm me
"foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
Ralph Waldo Emmerson :essays
Last edited by belovelife; 01-16-2009 at 09:32 PM..
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
» Advertisement |
|
|
|