Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Astronomy and Cosmology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-08-2009   #1 (permalink)
Moadib's Avatar
Thinking


 
Moadib is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Big bang vs Einstiens theory of reletivity?

Is anyone aware of any studies on the effects of Einstiens theory of relativity on time at the point of the big bang?
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2009   #2 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
Creating

Administrator
Editor

Location:
Silver Spring, MD, USA
 
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Arrow Replied to in another thread

I think this post replying to a similar question in another thread addresses this thread’s question.


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009   #3 (permalink)
xersan's Avatar
Questioning


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Big bang vs Einstiens theory of relativity?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moadib View Post
Is anyone aware of any studies on the effects of Einstiens theory of relativity on time at the point of the big bang?
Yes. I realized an analyzing. But the results did not certificate the theory SR. In my opinion the relative speeds are not the master reason for space-time. I perceived that the master reason is the limited speed of light.


----------------
The science has never a blinker.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009   #4 (permalink)
HydrogenBond's Avatar
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Big bang vs Einstiens theory of reletivity?

At the instant of the BB, GR would have been extreme, meaning time dilation. If we said the inflation occurred in a tiny amount of time, in which reference are we talking? If it was our earth reference, using GR time dilation of the BB, the event in the BB would have occurred faster because that reference was time dilated. If we assume the BB reference, a lot of time would have passed in our earth time reference, in that tiny amount of time.

For example, something falling into a black holes seems to fall for a very long time. The expansion within the BB reference may be fast, but wouldn't someone in our reference see it appear to take a very long time since the BB clock is moving so slow?

The first model I ever worked on was a relativistic slow down model, where I used the BB and earth references, separately. You get different results because you have two different clocks.

Last edited by HydrogenBond; 02-21-2009 at 04:51 AM..
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009   #5 (permalink)
xersan's Avatar
Questioning


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Big bang vs Einstiens theory of reletivity?

The theories SR and GR tell the time of every cosmic unit works with different tempo due to its relative speed. And it is imposible to set relationships is between cosmic units according to Einstein's theories because of not obtaining synchronous time .

But we can analyze this problem by a new model (named "Effective form of universe").


----------------
The science has never a blinker.

Last edited by xersan; 02-22-2009 at 01:52 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Origin of the Universe,,,,Bang or no Bang Harry Costas Astronomy and Cosmology 860 07-17-2009 07:32 AM
Relativity discussion from "Origin of the Universe,,,,Bang or no Bang" Little Bang Physics and Mathematics 7 05-21-2008 06:58 AM
Origin of the Universe: No Bang, Splash! (New theory) SlipString Astronomy and Cosmology 11 02-22-2007 04:07 AM
The Gravity Model vs Big Bang Theory W.Davidson Astronomy and Cosmology 43 06-25-2006 10:10 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network