Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Astronomy and Cosmology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-30-2009   #1 (permalink)
Little Bang's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Ledbetter, Texas
 
Little Bang is a glorious beacon of lightLittle Bang is a glorious beacon of lightLittle Bang is a glorious beacon of lightLittle Bang is a glorious beacon of lightLittle Bang is a glorious beacon of light
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
GPS Time

Can someone tell me the difference in time on a GPS clock than the same clock on the ground?


----------------
From a drop of water a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other. Sherlock Holmes
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009   #2 (permalink)
UncleAl's Avatar
Creating


Location:
Southern California, USA
 
UncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: GPS Time

Versus a ground observer, the three GPS atomic clocks/satellite run slower for their relative velocity (Special Relaltivity) and faster for being higher out of the gravitational well (General Relativity).

What the Global Positioning System Tells Us About Relativity

http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjjacob/Lecture16.pdf
Relativity in the Global Positioning System
Relativity in the GPS system

Relativity in the Global Positioning System
Physics of GPS relativistic time delay « Unused Cycles
Relativistic effects on orbital clocks


----------------
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009   #3 (permalink)
Little Bang's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Ledbetter, Texas
 
Little Bang is a glorious beacon of lightLittle Bang is a glorious beacon of lightLittle Bang is a glorious beacon of lightLittle Bang is a glorious beacon of lightLittle Bang is a glorious beacon of light
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: GPS Time

Ok Uncle, how about a geosynchronous satellite?


----------------
From a drop of water a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other. Sherlock Holmes
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009   #4 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
Creating

Administrator
Editor

Location:
Silver Spring, MD, USA
 
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Post How to calculate the time dilation of satellites in circular orbits

We’ve discussed calculating the time dilation of satellites in circular orbits at least a few times in the past few years (eg: in 5/2008’s Re: An exercise the application of relativity to satellites – and by “we”, I see it’s actually you and me, LB). The gist of it is, the higher your orbit, the faster your clock.

The exact formulae are:
v= \sqrt{\frac{u}{r}}
\frac{t_s}{t_f} = \sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}} = \sqrt{1-\frac{u}{c^2r}}
\frac{t_s}{t_d} = \sqrt{1-\frac{2u}{c^2r}}
where: u = G M, a constant, Earth’s (or any other body you care to orbit) standard gravitational parameter;
v is a satellite in circular orbit’s speed;
t_s is the elapsed time of the satellite;
t_f is the elapsed time of an observer at rest relative to the Earth; and
f_d is the elapsed time of an observer very distant from the Earth.

Putting together the two kinds of time dilation gives total time dilation, and comparing it to a point on the Earth (r \dot= 6578 \,\mbox{km}, stationary at the poles, to about 478 m/s at the equator), you can find the time dilation for a satellite in a circular orbit at any altitude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Bang View Post
… how about a geosynchronous satellite?
Using the above formulae, at an geosynchronous altitude of about 42164 km, the time dilation relative to a point on Earth is between about 1.00000000053899601 and 1.00000000053772289, compared to between 1.00000000042704857 and 1.00000000042577546 for one at typical GPS satellite altitude of about 20200 km. For an observer very far from and at rest relative to the Earth, the factor’s about 1.00000000067548042 to 1.00000000067420731.

It’s interesting to note that at an altitude between about 3270 and 3289 km, a satellite’s clock is synchronized with one on a particular place on Earth’s surface, while at altitude’s below that, the factor is less than 1 (about 0.99999999969400984 to .99999999969273673 at 200 km, about as low as you can get without hitting too much atmosphere), that is, clocks in low Earth orbit run slower than clocks on the surface.

A warning about the “abouts” in the above: despite their apparent precision, they were calculated using only the Earth, ignoring the Sun and other bodies, so really are only approximate. Time dilation due to the Sun is greater on the scale of the orbit of planets is greater than due to the Earth on the scale of typical Earth satellite orbits – for example, Mercury’s orbit has a time dilation factor relative to Earth orbit of about .999999961751477, Jupiter’s about 1.000000011960276, about 100 times greater than the preceding Earth orbit examples.


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How could you alter time?? Is time an existance?? buddyzen Astronomy and Cosmology 3 09-12-2008 07:30 PM
Introduction-Time Control Using Relativistic Time Dilation marvel Introductions 4 09-10-2008 11:25 AM
Relaxed time & concentrated time paigetheoracle Philosophy Forums 4 09-26-2006 12:06 PM
Time In Physics And Time In Buddhism amrit Theology forum 14 06-22-2006 02:35 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:16 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network