DanielFB,
Between Qfwfq and UncleAl I feel answered adequately your first post. However
the one below needs a bit more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielFB
this sounds good, but however, I regret to say that if space is now physical it can no longer be space. I like to think of it in terms of a football field and it's boundaries. Now, it matters not  how many players there are in the field, the boundaries never increase. What happens is new. The players fill over the edges, but the boundaries remain really fixed into reality. The same applies to space. But if general relaitivity is right, space must now be thought of as a mental construct, and nothing physical, say.
|
I have reread this a few times and am now not sure of your position.
Space is "physical" or not. [may you meant to not for now]
The space we live in is only a metric (like the boundries in your example) or
a measure. Whenever we represent a system by some graph or picture, it
is always a mental construct (GR or otherwise). We define a set of
coordinates and scale to assist with our graph and orient it appropriately.
It maybe you are not aware of Differential Geometry as Qfwfq mention or
considering other forms of Geometry than that of Euclid as UncleAl said.
Non-Euclidian geometry has been with us since about the 1850s or so. It is
true it was not fully utilized in physics until General Relativity. This is the
modern view today though.
Do a google search on "Differential Geometry" or "Noneuclidian geometry",
goto Wolfrom website or Mathworld or something. Learning new things is
good.
maddog