i want to hear peoples theorys about Black Holes. please read.

[sergey500]

Tidusiya, please stop yelling...or fix you're keyboard. Don't be so ignorant. Besudes, how can you say "...BELIEVE IT OR NOT', this is a science (and math) community. Ignoring other opinions in science is one of the most foolish things you can do. Listen to other people, think it through, because even if it seems THAT logical to you that you're right, you never know, someone can prove you wrong...i found that one out the hard way.

As for white holes not existing...you're kidding right? Everything that has a beginning has an end, Black holes are of no exception. If something enters it, something must exit it. If a black hole can suck in light (making it black, but that is debatable) so there must be an exit where the light comes out, thus making it bright...A WHITE HOLE. Well thats how i see it, i don't have any solid evidance of it's existance, but it logic thats on my side.

[infamous]

Originally Posted by TIDUSGIYA

white holes are a myth.

How would you define the Big Bang TID...............or don't you put any stock in the standard model?........................Infy

[bumab]

I'm an ecologist, so somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but...

Originally Posted by sergey500

As for white holes not existing...you're kidding right? Everything that has a beginning has an end, Black holes are of no exception. If something enters it, something must exit it. If a black hole can suck in light (making it black, but that is debatable) so there must be an exit where the light comes out...

The light does come out, but not as light. Black holes can be thought of as constantly "evaporating." They are always releasing radiation along the edge of an event horizon. Eventually, when stuff stops falling into them, the radiation out will exceed the radiation (and matter) going in, and a black hole will begin to shrink- so what goes in does come out, but not in the manner you were imagining, I think.

oh, and that's 1000 posts! wow, i talk a lot.

[sergey500]

Sorry I have to disagree with you there, bumab, what you're talking about is called Hawking radiation. This radiation does not come directly from the black hole itself, but rather is a result of virtual particles being "boosted" by the black hole's gravitation into becoming real particles. Light particles/waves have nothing to do with it. Or so I think.

Quatuam Mechanics, my dear watson, elementry really, that why it confuses the heck out of me. Not really, but I remember at one point it did and I spend a week researching this stuff. I could be wrong, but then again thats why we post...so we can learn from our mistakes. Or to show off our immense knowledge. Or some other reason.

[insight]

Originally Posted by sergey500

A true genius would never admitt he or she is genius, instead confirm that he or she has a lot to learn and does not know everything.

A genius is a person with distinguished mental prowess. This can manifest either as a foremost intellect, or as an outstanding creative talent. The term also applies to one who is a polymath, or someone skilled in many mental areas. The term specifically applies to mental rather than athletic skills, although it is also colloquially used to denote the possession of a superior talent in any field; e.g., Pelé may be said to have a genius for football or Gandhi for diplomacy.

Norman Bethune is a canadian genius. He sacrificed more than a human can do. There are lots of Genius who are selfish too. So my conclusion is whether a person is a genius or not doesn't really matter. A coin has two sides.

[InfiniteNow]

Genuinely
Enlightened
Notably proufound individual
Improving
Understanding
Simply

[InfiniteNow]

Originally Posted by sergey500

Sorry I have to disagree with you there, bumab, what you're talking about is called Hawking radiation. This radiation does not come directly from the black hole itself, but rather is a result of virtual particles being "boosted" by the black hole's gravitation into becoming real particles. Light particles/waves have nothing to do with it. Or so I think.

Hawking radiation it is.
Summarized: Particle and anti-particle pairs continually pop into and out of existence. Everywhere and always. If this "popping into existence" of the pair happens too close to the black hole, one of the members of the pair might get sucked in while the other manages to escape, or it "radiates," away from the hole. The one that escapes, since it is now a part of the universe, defaults to a "real" particle.



edit: You should site your sources too, since the first paragraph of your post came word-for-word from the wikipedia link I attached.

[sergey500]

Nice G.E.N.I.U.S thing.

As for my siting...well I wanted to say same exact thing...and it was there...and my hand was on crt and c key and it was tempting...and I got lazy. That should explain it all, I got lazy.

But, I could be either very brain dead today, or I just do not see how this disproves white holes...yeah, its offical, today I am brain-dead. Or extremely narrow-minded.

[Harry Costas]

Whats in a Black Hole

We know that Black Holes grow from Ultra Dense star bodies.

So lets look at Neutron stars and the so called quark star.

see links
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...er_020410.html

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/...?Neutron+stars

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/...rch?Black+Hole


So!! whats in a Black Hole, not a hole, but compacted subatomic particals that compacted billions of time its own volumn.

Possibly neutrons and maybe quarks. Quarks make up neutrons and neutrons being neutral in charge are able to be compacted something of the order 10^18. This is extreme density.

[amkanthal]

Hello!