Our universe through a wormhole

[Harry Costas]

Hello Ryan

As for infinitenow French words,,,,,,,,,,,I would not even think about it.

Warp I think is at the speed of light.


AS for proving
"Worm Holes" are science fiction.

So is "time travel".

So is going through a "Black Hole" and coming out of the other side in one part.

If someone can prove to me it can be done I will be happy.


Worm Holes and Black holes are located with ultra dense matter that would skin you trillions of kilometers away at the aprroach.

As for time travel to occur the process is impsossible. Maybe beyond me.

Although I have one in the garage that does not work.

[Harry Costas]

Hello Ryan

As for infinitenow French words,,,,,,,,,,,I would not even think about it.

Warp I think is at the speed of light.


AS for proving
"Worm Holes" are science fiction.

So is "time travel".

So is going through a "Black Hole" and coming out of the other side in one part.

If someone can prove to me it can be done I will be happy.


Worm Holes and Black holes are located with ultra dense matter that would skin you trillions of kilometers away at the approach.

As for time travel to occur the process is impsossible. Maybe beyond me.

Although I have one in the garage that does not work.

[InfiniteNow]

Originally Posted by Harry Costas

Hello Ryan

As for infinitenow French words,,,,,,,,,,,I would not even think about it.

Warp I think is at the speed of light.

WTF?

[GreekTTC]

Originally Posted by Harry Costas

Worm Holes are science fiction.


So is time travel.

So is going through a Black Hole and coming out of the other side in one part.

I don't want to offend you...but your posts are, for the most part, useless.

A round Earth was science fiction at one time. So were airplanes and trips to the moon. How can you so blindly make your assertions? I don't get it.

[InfiniteNow]

Originally Posted by GreekTTC

How can you so blindly make your assertions? I don't get it.

Beware: Your request may result in a thousand links with nothing quoted and only tangentially related information.

[GreekTTC]

Originally Posted by InfiniteNow

Beware: Your request may result in a thousand links with nothing quoted and only tangentially related information.

We don't really exist. Here's my proof: http://www.google.com

[Harry Costas]

Hello All

We can imagine what we want.

Give me evidence and I will consider
worm holes
time travel
or what ever

I wish we could do all those things. But I cannot see it being probable.

Thats me

[InfiniteNow]

Harry,

What did you mean by that "French words" statement? That's what confused me. Please clarify.

As for evidence, currently it's only mathematical, but you might look into the work of Thorne and/or Asimov. They're two of my favorites.

Cheers.

[Eclogite]

Harry,
I await, with interest, a response to my post (#29) of three days ago.
I believe the questions remain relevant and your answers important to an understanding of your position.
Patiently,
Ophiolite.

[Harry Costas]

Hello Eclogite

Sorry being very busy

is it a response to
"That is an interesting suggestion. Which aspect of Special Relativity do you think is flawed? How would you set about demonstrating this flaw? (Are any presently planned investigations likely to reveal it?) Do you think the flaw is fundamental or approximate? By which I mean, if approximate, it works for certain conditions approximately, just as Newton works approximiately for slow moving objects. Or, is it just plain wrong?"

please explain further what you want