Yes Nani: Please edit your post to remove all of the tags. It seems perhaps you used WORD to create the post and cut/pasted. This adds tons of additional tags that mess up the post. By simply copying the text from your post and putting it on Notepad, all the tags go away. That is What I did to reply.
Quote:
Originally posted by: sunofindia
Hi guy’s its Murthy(nani) a 12th Std. Student interested in astronomy. Well I like give to my views about the beginning of Universe, forgive me if any mistakes in my theory and here It goes.
|
Welcome to the list. Not sure which you prefer to be called? I note India in your name. Where do you live? Relocated? Is English a primary language for you? These things help reply so any differences in termonology, approach, ... can be best understood. I also am not sure of what 12th Std means. 12th Grade (High School Senior) Standard level?
As to your views. It is very encouraging to see you acknowledge that there may be errors in them. I hope that means you are looking for a critical analysis and corrective input. Too many people that show up here to promote various views just want them accepted and agressively reject any critical review.
We all benefit from new ideas and the critical review of them. We welcome such new members.
Quote:
|
According to this theory, initially there was nothing except dark energy.
|
Well this becomes a problem. Your theory starts out by requiring acceptance of the existence of dark energy with nothing to support that assertion other than your statement that it did exist.
It also does not provide any clue as to what this dark energy is. Yet it is the primary agent in your theory. We would need to know the properties of this dark energy stuff to understand how it would then work.
What "time"? "Time" is part of our current physical spacetime continuum. It is not something that is seperate from energy/ matter. How do you proposed that "time" fits into your "dark energy"?
So now you require blind acceptance of two major components of it.
Quote:
|
due 2 internal causes like more attraction between the particles
|
What is the mechanism of this attraction? Gravity? How does gravity operate in your theory? Strong or Weak forces. Where are they coming from?
Quote:
|
(This particles are nothing but the spacial particles. Well you will know about this when my friend puts his theory of spacial particles)
|
Making up new names doesn't help explain things. If its a particle its a particle. If you want to assert some other "thing", we need an explanation as to what that thing is and how it functions.
Quote:
|
Infact spacial particles contain energy. The dark energy got converted to other forms of energy like light, sound, matter etc…
|
Sound does not share much with light regarding being "energy". Sound does not travel thru a vaccum. It is not a particle of it's own (photon). Sound is locational perturbations of physical molecules. It is not valid in this context.
Quote:
|
A universe is created when this dark energy gets converted to matter. In this process, some energy may also get converted to light and sound.
|
Again, sound does not belong in here. Light IS matter to the extent that it a photon. Thus it is redundant to say dark energy gets converted to matter AND light.
Quote:
|
Even from the matter some of it got condensed and formed celestial bodies. (For eg: Formation of Jupiter. It is formed when a cloud of atmosphere surrounding sun, suddenly got condessed due to gravitational pull)
|
We pretty well know that
"a cloud of atmosphere" had to have come from a secondary development process AFTER the first round of stars formed. The heavier elemen
----------------
Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head
Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator
