Origin of the Universe,,,,Bang or no Bang

[HydrogenBond]

One of my older theories, to explain how so many galaxies could form in such a small time at the beginning of the universe, was connected to these galaxies expanding from dense centers of galaxy scale mass-energy. What made me think along this line was the amount of time required to form some of the most highly spiraled galaxies and super structure, based on using the existing models, should have taken longer then the universe is old.

Although I could not prove the earliest galaxies formed in galaxy scale popcorn fashion, this theory did not have any of the conceptual time problems associated with the highly spiral galaxies and superstructure formation. It did not have to ignore this data. I pictured the situation as mini big bangs with early galaxies puffing up. The black hole in the center may be a trace of what may have been; dense zone of mass/space/time.

The question becomes how do you get from a BB singularity and cause this to subdivide down to galaxy sized chunks, which then mini-big bang, with some going too far causing matter to be hurled deeper into space for the traditional galaxy contraction mechanism? This came to me very recently.

The model I came up with has to do with entropy and the wave-particle nature of matter and energy. A point singularity, for initial universe formation, as well as black holes, indirectly define the general characteristics of a particle state. A particle, by definition, acts like a singular state. Although these singularities are not particles in the formal sense, they behaving like they are in one place like a particle. All we need to do is shift the ratio of this particle analogy to particle-wave and the phenomena will change, such as in the double slit experiment, where the wave aspect allows the phenomena to effect two slits at once, and is therefore not acting like a singularity any more.

The next question is how do you shift a more or less pure particle type phenomena into a wave-particle phenomena? The simple answer is to increase entropy, since being in two places, like in the double slit, increases the disorder or entropy of the singularity. So we have entropy driving the particle-wave shift, which causes the singularity to show both particle and wave effects, implicit of a split where it can be in two places instead of only one.

If we keep causing the split states, to wave out further, using higher and higher entropy, it breaks down into smaller and smaller particle like singularities, each going through their own double slit, until we reach the mini big bang phase. The next question is, what is the nature of the double slit, which in experiments is created by a wall and slits?

If the minimum sized star needed to form a blackhole is about 3.8 solar masses and this blackhole is a singularity, it has its GR reference at the limit. A larger blackhole will not change this limiting center reference, but will only have more of it. If the larger blackhole has a different center GR reference, the smaller blackholes would not be blackholes, but something that falls short of the limiting reference; gray holes?

When we get the first entropy-wave-particle split of the singularity, the wall for the double slit is the limiting GR reference, which will not change until we get to 3.8 solar masses. As far as the splitting sees, everything is still overlapping due to the point-instant reference seen by all. The solid wall is this lingering GR limiting reference. The slits that appear in this wall are created by entropy potential, with increasing entropy, increases the number of slits. I like the idea of this occurring in a quantum way, until there are more slits than wall; mini big bangs due to too much wave. This causes the universe to expand relative to galaxies with the uniformity due to all seeing their limiting GR reference change at the same time.