|
Published by C1ay 05-02-2005
| ||
| ||
| | ||
|
#1
By
Tormod
on
05-03-2005
| |
| Re: Do black holes exist? Quote:
There may not be direct evidence yet but there is plenty of indirect evidence. Here is an article from the Max Planck Society from February 2005: Black Holes in a radar trap European astronomers succeeded for the first time to confirm the signatures predicted near Black Holes by Albert Einstein's theory of Relativity in the light of the cosmic X-ray background. http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrati...223/index.html | |
|
#2
By
paultrr
on
05-03-2005
| |
| Re: Do black holes exist? Quote:
| |
|
#4
By
paultrr
on
05-03-2005
| |
| Re: Do black holes exist? Quote:
I agree, its interesting and suggests that perhaps I ought to relook at my own model again. | |
|
#5
By
BlameTheEx
on
06-17-2005
|
| Re: Do black holes exist? Nice to note that somebody else is saying what i have been posting here for some time: that Einstein didn't believe in black holes and nobody has actually seen one. However Einstein would not have given the thumbs up to this particular theory. He argued that it was impossible to get an escape velocity of C. For that matter he was not a fan of quantum physics. The indirect evidence for black holes is not as conclusive as presented. What it boils down to is that there are dark massive objects out there that are black holes if the maths works that way, and just dark massive objects if the maths doesn't! It doesn't take much thought to realise that some sort of dark massive object is going to form if enough matter gets together - and that matter is inappropriate for fusion. Ether the result will be a black hole or it won't. Regardless from here it will appear the same, or rather it won't appear because it is black. My conclusion is that the physics of such objects is wide open for debate. |
|
#6
By
Bobby
on
07-21-2005
| |
| Re: Do black holes exist? Quote:
The Einsteir Field Equations are a set of differential equations that are very sensitive to initial conditions. Depending on the selection of initial conditions, you can get pretty much any result you want. I do not claim to be able to solve thses equations but it seems to me that if you create a set of initial conditions that would not lead to the Universe as it is today, you are on the wrong path. I strongly suspect that some "scientists", especially those selling book, don't bother to check the "reality" of their initial conditions. Not more than a month ago I saw a "scientist" explaining how, if you went faster than light, the equations of Special Relativity says that you would be traveling back in time. Crap like this really irritates me. Apparently he believes that no one watching his program ever heard of imaginary numbers. The Lorentz equations seem simple enough to me. As anything approaches the event horizon of a "Black Hole", the light will become more and more red shifted and fainter and fainter until the light simply fades away. As to what happens to matter, does anyone really believe that any form of matter would survive a trip to the event horizin? If it would not, there appears to be only one alternative, namely the matter has taken the form of energy and has simply faded away. | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Article Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Article | Article Starter | Category | Comments | Last Post |
| Era of Galaxy and Black Hole Growth Spurt Discovered | C1ay | Astronomy news | 0 | 04-07-2005 03:41 AM |
| Creating black holes | bumab | Astronomy and Cosmology | 6 | 03-18-2005 04:05 AM |
| Black holes influence knowledge of the universe | C1ay | Astronomy news | 19 | 03-11-2005 01:51 PM |
| Black holes regulate galaxy formation | Tormod | Astronomy news | 0 | 02-09-2005 10:49 PM |
| Postulate for black holes (please critique) | DosJunkie | Astronomy and Cosmology | 0 | 01-06-2004 04:21 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 PM.













