Science Forums
Advanced search
User Name
Password

Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Science News > Astronomy news
Become a science forums sponsor today
Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools
Published by C1ay 06-22-2006
Black holes light up the universe and astronomers may finally know how. New data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory show for the first time powerful magnetic fields are the key to these brilliant and startling light shows.

It is estimated up to one quarter of the radiation in the universe emitted since the big bang comes from material falling towards supermassive black holes, including those powering quasars, the brightest known objects. For decades, scientists have struggled to understand how black holes, the darkest objects in the universe, can be responsible for such prodigious amounts of radiation.

New X-ray data from Chandra give the first clear explanation for what drives this process: magnetic fields. Chandra observed a black hole system in our galaxy, known as GRO J1655-40 (J1655, for short), where a black hole was pulling material from a companion star into a disk.

"By intergalactic standards J1655 is in our backyard, so we can use it as a scale model to understand how all black holes work, including the monsters found in quasars," said Jon M. Miller of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Miller's paper on these results appears in this week's issue of Nature.

Gravity alone is not enough to cause gas in a disk around a black hole to lose energy and fall onto the black hole at the rates required by observations. The gas must lose some of its orbital angular momentum, either through friction or a wind, before it can spiral inward. Without such effects, matter could remain in orbit around a black hole for a very long time.

Scientists have long thought magnetic turbulence could generate friction in a gaseous disk and drive a wind from the disk that carries angular momentum outward, allowing the gas to fall inward.

Using Chandra, Miller and his team provided crucial evidence for the role of magnetic forces in the black hole accretion process. The X-ray spectrum, the number of X-rays at different energies, showed the speed and density of the wind from J1655's disk corresponded to computer simulation predictions for magnetically-driven winds. The spectral fingerprint also ruled out the two other major competing theories to winds driven by magnetic fields.

"In 1973, theorists came up with the idea that magnetic fields could drive the generation of light by gas falling onto black holes," said co-author John Raymond of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass. "Now, over 30 years later, we finally may have convincing evidence."

This deeper understanding of how black holes accrete matter also teaches astronomers about other properties of black holes, including how they grow.

"Just as a doctor wants to understand the causes of an illness and not merely the symptoms, astronomers try to understand what causes phenomena they see in the universe," said co-author Danny Steeghs, also of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. "By understanding what makes material release energy as it falls onto black holes, we may also learn how matter falls onto other important objects."

In addition to accretion disks around black holes, magnetic fields may play an important role in disks detected around young sun-like stars where planets are forming, as well as ultra-dense objects called neutron stars.

NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala., manages the Chandra program for the agency's Science Mission Directorate. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory controls science and flight operations from the Chandra X-ray Center, Cambridge, Mass.

Source: Chandra Observatory
  #1  
By cwes99_03 on 06-22-2006
Re: NASA's Chandra Solves Black Hole Paradox

I'm opposed to articles like this, namely that the author of the paper says now we MAY have convincing evidence.

Then it only takes one casual reader to read the headlines and start touting it as fact. Sorry Clay, I realize you are just bringing the article to us. They should wait until more definitive evidence is reached. Meantime, they can share their enthusiasm with a couple of colleagues but otherwise not the general populace. Disinformation, though not intentional, it still hurts those who are casual readers. Maybe the title of the article just needs to be changed I don't know.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
By Tormod on 06-23-2006
Re: NASA's Chandra Solves Black Hole Paradox

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwes99_03
I'm opposed to articles like this, namely that the author of the paper says now we MAY have convincing evidence.
So write articles yourself! No better way to enlighten people. But I think you're placing too little trust in people's intelligence.

The way I read this article the scientist in question is convinced that he has enough evidence to back up his theories. He might never have *conclusive* evidence.

If we could not write articles like this, there would be no science writing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
By cwes99_03 on 06-23-2006
Re: NASA's Chandra Solves Black Hole Paradox

Are you guys actually writing these? I guess I was always under the impression that these were snippets from Reuters or something like that.

Didn't mean to insult anyone. Maybe we can work on titling a bit. It's been years since I did journalism. I was always a better editor than a writer.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
By pgrmdave on 06-23-2006
Re: NASA's Chandra Solves Black Hole Paradox

You're correct, we don't write them ourselves, but that shouldn't stop you from writing an article, if you have the time and patience to perform the research and whatnot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
By C1ay on 06-23-2006
Re: NASA's Chandra Solves Black Hole Paradox

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwes99_03
Are you guys actually writing these?
No, the credited source at the end is a clickable link to the source of the article.
Reply With Quote
Comment

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Article Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
NASA's Chandra Finds Black Holes Stirring Up Galaxies C1ay Astronomy news 1 02-18-2006 09:45 PM
Chandra Proves Black Hole Influence Is Far Reaching C1ay Astronomy news 0 12-06-2005 04:33 AM
NASA'S Chandra Observatory Catches X-ray Super-flares C1ay Astronomy news 0 05-11-2005 06:15 AM
what is black hole made out of and what does a black hole "experience"? Tim_Lou Physics and Mathematics 37 11-26-2004 02:34 AM
Black Hole=anti-matter universe worm hole? Frogon Astronomy and Cosmology 8 05-19-2004 12:47 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:20 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network
Powered by GARS © 2005-2008