Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Biology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-23-2008   #101 (permalink)
REASON's Avatar
Transparent Reflection


Location:
Blue Springs, MO - USA
 
REASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Evolution is Fact

Quote:
Originally Posted by goku View Post
is it the right answer? so many answers would work.
Yes, many would, all of which could be proven. But many wouldn't work (such as 182251 x 4 = 911255) because you couldn't prove it. That's the point.


Quote:
Originally Posted by goku View Post
scientists have great imaginations, but their's is no greater than yours.
The way I see it the more knowledge and information you have, the greater the potential of your imagination. I would suggest that the imagination of a two day old newborn is incredibly limited.


Quote:
Originally Posted by goku View Post
when you believe them you give them power, power to control you.
Belief is not really about giving power, it's about taking responsibility.


Quote:
Originally Posted by goku View Post
because of so called global warming, they will control what light bulbs you can buy, and they brain washed you into thinking that you are helping yourself by taking their light bulb.
Is this what you're really concerned about? Light bulbs? Do you really care whether or not light bulbs become more efficient?

I'm not buying your concern about giving up power anyway. You have obviously given yours to religious ideology and don't seem to have a problem with that, other than the fact that you keep coming here for information. I hope you continue to come here.


Quote:
Originally Posted by goku View Post
i don't know if that came out right, sometimes it's hard for me to put into words the thoughts in my head, even worse with a key board
Well, that's a common problem for people. No worries. If you feel you're not being understood, just see if you can restate whatever it is you're trying to get across.


----------------
It seems to me that people tend to prefer to believe what they want to be real or true, despite evidence to the contrary.

When what you believe is refuted by evidence, you are faced with a choice.

Last edited by REASON; 05-23-2008 at 03:46 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #102 (permalink)
REASON's Avatar
Transparent Reflection


Location:
Blue Springs, MO - USA
 
REASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Evolution is Fact

Quote:
Originally Posted by goku View Post
hmm, how could it be a scientific fact today and scientifically proven wrong tomorrow?
What? I'm not sure what the "it" is you're referring to.

Science is not product, it's a process.


----------------
It seems to me that people tend to prefer to believe what they want to be real or true, despite evidence to the contrary.

When what you believe is refuted by evidence, you are faced with a choice.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #103 (permalink)
goku's Avatar
Suspended


Location:
poksville,ga.
 
goku is infamous around these partsgoku is infamous around these partsgoku is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Evolution is Fact

Quote:
Originally Posted by REASON View Post
What? I'm not sure what the "it" is you're referring to.
the it is nothing specific
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #104 (permalink)
goku's Avatar
Suspended


Location:
poksville,ga.
 
goku is infamous around these partsgoku is infamous around these partsgoku is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Evolution is Fact

Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteNow View Post
evolution is fact.
a scientific fact?
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #105 (permalink)
REASON's Avatar
Transparent Reflection


Location:
Blue Springs, MO - USA
 
REASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond reputeREASON has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Evolution is Fact

Quote:
Originally Posted by goku View Post
a scientific fact?
Are there any other kind?


----------------
It seems to me that people tend to prefer to believe what they want to be real or true, despite evidence to the contrary.

When what you believe is refuted by evidence, you are faced with a choice.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #106 (permalink)
InfiniteNow's Avatar
Suspended


Location:
Austin, TX
 
InfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Evolution is Fact

Goku,

I'd like for you to first tell me how you define "scientific." Once you do, I will address your question.


If you seriously believe that evolution is false, then I'm afraid no information, no data, no evidence will ever be good enough to convince you otherwise, as evolution is truly the most robust and well supported scientific theory ever put forth in the history of human kind. You also should recall that a scientific theory is quite different than how the word "theory" is used in common parlance. The following page does a fair job of covering this pertinent distinction:

Theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Again, once you tell me how you are definining "scientific" when you use it as a descriptor of the word "fact," I will gladly address your question.

Thanks for your participation.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #107 (permalink)
C1ay's Avatar
¿42?

Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor

Location:
33.78N 84.66W
 
C1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Evolution is Fact

Quote:
Originally Posted by goku View Post
hmm, how could it be a scientific fact today and scientifically proven wrong tomorrow?
I think that post would make a nice illustration for the Wiki article on Straw Man. Any Wiki editors around?
Attached Thumbnails
Evolution is Fact-strawman.jpg  


----------------
Clay

Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
Add yourself to Hypography's Frappr.
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008   #108 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
Creating

Administrator
Editor

Location:
Silver Spring, MD, USA
 
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Lightbulb Similarities and distinctions between scientifc and religious mindsets

Quote:
Originally Posted by goku View Post
hmm, how could it be a scientific fact today and scientifically proven wrong tomorrow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by C1ay View Post
I think that post would make a nice illustration for the Wiki article on Straw Man. Any Wiki editors around?
I don’t think this goku’s post is a good example of a straw man fallacy, because the position it exaggerates is so far from what most people understand a scientific position to be that it’s not recognizable. The caricature of science it suggests, while recognizable to some communities, such as anti-technological conspiracy theorists and some kinds of religious fundamentalists, is obscure to most readers of hypography and wikipedia.

Instead, I think it reveals a profound misunderstanding of the scientific method. It’s reasoning appears to be something like this:
  • “Scientific facts” are absolute certainties;
  • However, science frequently rejects previous “scientific facts”;
  • Therefore, science is contradictory and absurd.
The flaw in this argument is, I’m confident most hypography readers recognize, that “scientific facts” are not absolute certainties. Rather, they are statements that can be supported by some well-defined and widely accepted standard of evaluation. Such standards change, so what is a “scientific fact” at one time may not be at an early or later time. Even on the same day, what is a fact in one scientific context may not be in another – for example, conservation of mass, momentum, and energy are “facts” in systems well described by simple Newtonian mechanics, such as bridges and construction cranes, but not in systems not well described by them, such as particle accelerators and radioactive substances.

As I’ve stated a few times around these forums, I don’t personally see a distinct division between ancient religious dogma and modern scientific theories. At some time, based on some well-defined and widely accepted standard of evaluation, ideas such as the many creation stories (Genesis etc.) of the many religions were, I think, effectively credible scientific theories, based on the then best available understanding of reality. However, as our understanding of reality improved, these accounts were rejected. For many religious people, they were redefined as not literally true, but as useful moral allegory. Others explained the literal failure of the old stories as due to the limited understanding of the original story tellers, and sought to reword them in scientifically correct terms. Still others rejected the new understanding, in many cases, explaining that the new understanding was due to corrupting deception by a god-like enemy, ie: “Satan the devil”. A fourth line of religious thought – commonly termed ‘orthodoxy” – hold that the literal truth or moral utility of the story is secondary to its ability to unite a religion, society, or nation – that religion is primarily a political tool.

One sees these and other basic modes of reluctances to acquire and apply new and different scientific understandings across generations and disciplines of scientists, and even as internal struggles within communities of and individual scientists.

I think the greatest distinction between a scientific and a religious mindset has to do the absolute acceptance of authority. In general and with some exceptions, scientific mindsets lack it, while religious ones have it.


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2008   #109 (permalink)
C1ay's Avatar
¿42?

Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor

Location:
33.78N 84.66W
 
C1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond reputeC1ay has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Similarities and distinctions between scientifc and religious mindsets

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
I don’t think this goku’s post is a good example of a straw man fallacy, because the position it exaggerates is so far from what most people understand a scientific position to be that it’s not recognizable.
I would agree with that. It is kind of like a straw man on steroids....


----------------
Clay

Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
Add yourself to Hypography's Frappr.
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2008   #110 (permalink)
Pyrotex's Avatar
Slaying Bad Memes

Moderator
Editor

Location:
Houston, Texas
Latest blog entry:
 
Pyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond reputePyrotex has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Pyrotex
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Similarities and distinctions between scientifc and religious mindsets

Someone famous once said that superstition is so damned pernicious because, to the superstitious, superstition isn't superstition, it's just what's so.

Likewise with "strawman arguments". Most folks not steeped in the scientific tradition, and especially if they have been exposed to anti-science suspicion, consider their strawman arguments simply to be a true and valid expression of what they THINK science says.

"Doesn't science say that yadda yadda yadda?"
"Isn't a theory just a yadda yadda yadda?"
"Doesn't the law of thermodynamics prove that yadda yadda yadda?"

And we, who ARE steeped in scientific thinking and rigorous analysis, can't say YES or NO. The questions are flawed. The questions are based on multiple layers of false assumptions, misrepresentations, word-twisting, misunderstanding and confusion.

Science ain't for sissies.


----------------
Hypography Forums Moderator
-- - - - - -
What concerns me is not the way things are, but rather the way people think things are.
Epictetus, Greek Philosopher
The map is NOT the territory.
Korzybski, Polish-American Philosopher
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
evolution fact


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Illuminati, Fact or Fiction Barry Scott Philosophy Forums 5 11-12-2008 08:15 PM
(Another "Refute This Claim !") Evolution: Fact or Fantasy tmaromine Biology 6 04-11-2008 03:55 AM
Evolution: Theory or Fact? Larv Theology forum 12 02-15-2007 11:59 AM
Fact or fiction? kkawohl Strange Claims Forum 7 12-22-2006 11:50 AM
Vampires: Fact or Fiction learnin to learn Strange Claims Forum 24 09-29-2006 07:59 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:37 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network