Evolution is Junk Science and Secular Religion

[TeleMad]

CD27, about the supposed human footprints along with dinosaur ones, that's been dropped by most Creationists. Here's a link that provides many other links on the topic.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://members.aol.com/paluxy2/paluxy.htm
">http://members.aol.com/paluxy2/paluxy.htm
</a>


Here's one that you should read: note the site...it's not an "evilutionist" one but a Creationist one.

http://www.biblicalcreation.org.uk/s...es/bcs106.html

[CD27]

really? oops..lol, sry. i can rad over it...but, FREETHINKER, i do accept many things that can be proven correct, i have yet to see how evolution itself is proven..care to give me some proofs without critisism? lol

Eric

[Tim_Lou]

hmm....

fossils records,
biochemistry similarities,
similarities in structures,
similarities in developments of embryoes.

details?
they are similar lol...which suggests a common ancestor.
dont know much...

[CD27]

me either
lol

[TeleMad]

Tim_Lou:

...

biochemistry similarities,

similarities in structures,

...

they are similar lol...which suggests a common ancestor.

Indeed.

All life forms - from humans to ants, from oak trees to E. coli - have the same general biochemistry. For example, not only are they all made of cells, but in all of them DNA is used to store the genetic information and RNA is used to make proteins, and proteins are used for various purposes such as catalyzing reactions. All organisms use the same genetic code (with only a handful of partial exceptions).

Structurally, all animals' cells are very similar. For example, mitochondria have their own small, circular DNA that is separate from that in the nucleus...the surpsring part is that there is a set of universal mitochonria genes: virtually all animals have the same set of a few dozen genes. All animal eyes are also related genetically and anatomically.

[Tim_Lou]

hey, but the main idea is this:

monkey's DNA is more simliar to human,
as compare to a mouse.

also like the protein in cat is more similar to those in a lion compare to a fly.

so, these suggest that monkeys are more closely related to human as mouse to human.

and a cat is more related to a lion than a lion to a fly.

[CD27]

but that by far proves that man evolved from monkey/apes...in fact, ho can anyone take a single skull, that is supposedly "bilions of years old" and say it was an early evolution of a huamn. right, funny, hahaha, how do they know it wasn't jsut an ape, a very old ape? and not a human? i got a question for you,if evolution is true, then why don't we see LIVING forms of these "stages" of evolution we find so much..and why is it only ONE that we find? and there is no way that evolution could happen over time, it either happened insteaintly,. or not at all. a fish can't jump on land and expect to ahve little babies who can also survive on land without dieing in the first 5 minutes of doing this. there is no way. and a fish can't grow little lungs under water and expect to live long enough to survive.

here is a link to further explain it.

http://www.changinglivesonline.org/evolution.html#complex


Eric

[Uncle Martin]

Originally posted by: IrishEyes

Hi there Unc! Ok, I'm going to spend the time to read all of this thread today (geez, you guys posted a lot of crap while I was gone!), but I wanted to just jump right in for now...



Dinos existed. I saw their bones in the Smithsonian. ;-) MY Bible doesn't call them dinosaurs though, as that term was not coined when MY Bible was written. However, MY Bible does mention behemoths and leviathans (in the Book of JOB), as well as other un-named large sea and land creatures.

Hi IrishEyes,

That's a very good answer. Just vague enough to include anything larger than a cow or porpoise. Of course I can't prove those were not the words used to describe dinosaurs any more than you can prove they were. But that seems to be a recurrent theme with the Bible. I wish I could go on about something, but I recognize futility when I see it.

[Tim_Lou]

"but that by far proves that man evolved from monkey/apes"

sry, but it is an common mistake!

apes, monkeys and humans are not like in evolutionary order.

the only thing is that they share a common ancestor, human does not evolved from monkeys!!!!

the ancestor went extinted, and there are fossils record of it.

[Freethinker]

Originally posted by: Tim_Lou
"but that by far proves that man evolved from monkey/apes"

sry, but it is an common mistake!

apes, monkeys and humans are not like in evolutionary order.

the only thing is that they share a common ancestor, human does not evolved from monkeys!!!!

the ancestor went extinted, and there are fossils record of it.

Excellent job Tim!

Yes, it is a common lie promoted by Creationists to claim humans came from today's apes. It shows willing to lie the leaders are and how ignorant the followers are in accepting it.

You did an excellent job of laying out the actual description.