Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Biology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2005   #21 (permalink)
OpenMind5's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Michigan
 
OpenMind5 is a jewel in the roughOpenMind5 is a jewel in the roughOpenMind5 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to OpenMind5 Send a message via Yahoo to OpenMind5
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Get it Straight

Boerseun...u are only fueling this off topic-ness. The topic is CHem. evoultion!
STAY ON IT!


----------------
Make sure you stop...take your moment....and keep it with you!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005   #22 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
Creating

Administrator
Editor

Location:
Silver Spring, MD, USA
 
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Speculation on the nature of the "primordial soup"

OK, OpenMind5. I get the idea that you’re interested in a discussion of how organisms made of highly organized, highly differentiated cells, such as fish, birds and mammals, including H. Sapiens, came to be as they presently are. I appreciate you efforts to keep this thread on-topic, and will try to respond in kind.

I don’t have a firm grasp of your position, but infer from some of your posts that you believe in either evolution, or “devolution” – that is, that the present species have not always been as they are, but are either becoming gradually more organized, or less. I’m guessing you subscribe to the mainstream theory of cellular genetics, believing that the genome encoded in cells’ nuclear DNA contains all or most of the information used to build the complex collection of cells that is the organism. Please inform me if I’ve guessed wrong.

My take, gleaned from reading popular biological literature – I’m a mathematician by training and a computer programmer by occupation, with only a non-specialist’s education in the biological sciences – is described in part by this short essay by Lyn Margulis. In short,
Quote:
… Cilia were once free-agents but they became an integral part of all animal cells ..
A bit more explanation is required beyond the Margulis piece. Specifically, I suspect that colonies of roughly circular bacteria entered into symbioses with more motile, spirochete-form bacteria, and perhaps other special-form microorganisms, giving rise to the first highly differentiated animal tissues. In short, I suspect that all of the highly-specialized cell forms in advanced organisms – sensory cilia, neural tissue, mitochondria – had their origins in independent, unusually-formed microorganisms. Further, I suspect that the process is slowly ongoing, that genetic information from foreign bacteria and viruses that regularly insert themselves into our DNA genome continue to introduce potentially useful traits. Like planetary accretion disks, large, advanced organisms collect and incorporate smaller, simpler organisms.

Give a bunch of 10-year-olds some Lego Technics/Mindstorm pieces, and observe how they construct a large, complicated machine. The most successful kids often do so by assembling arrays of small assemblies, playing with them to see which ones work well and work well together, then fusing them together into the final machine. I believe that nature plays in a similar way, and that we and our fellow biological organisms are the result.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005   #23 (permalink)
OpenMind5's Avatar
Explaining


Location:
Michigan
 
OpenMind5 is a jewel in the roughOpenMind5 is a jewel in the roughOpenMind5 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to OpenMind5 Send a message via Yahoo to OpenMind5
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Speculation on the nature of the "primordial soup"

CraigD,
It just seems that alot of post don't quite look at this period to well. (the ones i have read) They always fall onto beliefs and that doesn't belong here. I have many opions, the idea I was trying to get across was that maybe it was all a mistake. We all could be the result of a small error in what was the first orgaisms.


----------------
Make sure you stop...take your moment....and keep it with you!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005   #24 (permalink)
Boerseun's Avatar
Phantom Cow of Justice

Moderator

Location:
Hartbeespoort, South Africa
 
Boerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond reputeBoerseun has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Speculation on the nature of the "primordial soup"

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenMind5
We all could be the result of a small error in what was the first orgaisms.
That's indeed what we are. Evolution is the overall result of not only DNA-combining, but also errors in DNA duplication.


----------------
Hypography Forums Moderator

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII



Ecce bos taurus justitia
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If the Speed of Light changed, would we even notice it. WebFeet Astronomy and Cosmology 95 04-07-2007 07:39 AM
Maybe you'll be interested NAdams Strange Claims Forum 83 07-07-2005 03:52 AM
Einstein's Special Relativity Fails? Mac Physics and Mathematics 264 05-20-2005 08:11 PM
Shortest distance between two points Aki Physics and Mathematics 21 10-07-2004 11:17 PM
Straight Line? Eugene Physics and Mathematics 12 06-23-2002 08:30 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:43 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network