Science Forums
Advanced search
User Name
Password

Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Biology
Become a science forums sponsor today
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-22-2005   #1 (permalink)
Happeh's Avatar
Thinking


 



Open minded scientists closing threads. So predictable

Pgrmdave closed the evolution thread. I pointed out a post he made in another thread showed his thinking was flawed. Now he is taking revenge by closing the evolution thread I was posting in.

Dave, I know people like you. I know exactly what you will do. You will censor and delete any thread that contradicts what you think. Not because what is written is incorrect, because what is written challenges your authority and your beliefs. You will justify your actions by talking about how the discussion is too personal, too emotional or going nowhere.

When you read this post you will become even more upset. Someone is publicly pointing out that you are using your administrative powers for personal reasons. You are closing threads because you have something personal against a person. It is not my fault your post in the thread about TV shows was incomplete and shoddily written. You authored it, not me. Why not take responsiblilty for your writings instead of blaming the person who dissected it?

Around about now you will be deciding you hate me and I am trouble. You will be thinking even more revenge. I used to be appalled when people like you did the things you do. That was before I realized how common people like you are. People abusing their authority for personal vengeance.

It is not your job as admin to decide what people can and cannot talk about. People in the evolution thread asked me questions. I answered them. We have a conversation going on. Then you strut in and say "You guys cannot talk about what you want to talk about. I decide what can be talked about around here. I decide who has the right to speak". That is not right. Not becuase I say so. Because it is not right in the view of anyone for one person to censor the speech of another.

I was going to post the following to CraigD. It was important. Now I do not know if he will see it because you have closed the thread the reply belonged to. I think you need to grow up. I think you need to be more open minded. I think you need to act more like a dispassionate scientist as you are trained to be and stop acting like a petty tyrant squashing things they do not approve of.

-----


I understand what you are saying. I do not want to anger you or to be disrespectful.

How do I convince you that you are incorrect or partially correct? That you have been given incorrect information and conclusions? That necessary ideas to understanding what is going on are not part of your life view?

I am a nobody. I can't wave my badge or flag at you so that you can admit to yourself, "his qualifications are better than mine so I can bend the knee and accept what he says". If you met me in person, you would not be impressed at all. You would probably seek to avoid me based on my appearance and mannerisms.

It is a really big problem. First I have to convince you that you are incorrect. Then I have to convince you to listen to me. Then I have to convince you to read and look into things that you have probably been trained to ignore or deride. Then I have to convince you that you must spend months looking into this. It is not a math problem like 2 + 2 = 4 that gives you an answer in 5 seconds. This is like a scientific study that might take 1 year to complete before you are absolutely sure one way or the other.

That is a lot of convincing for me to do. Authoritative people do not like giving up their authority. Especially to a nobody. I don't hold out much hope I will be able to convince you. Your ego and your existence is wrapped up in your identity as an authoritative health person. To let go of their life anchor, their sense of self and identity, is traumatic for anyone in any discipline.
Old 08-22-2005   #2 (permalink)
Tormod's Avatar
Hypographer

Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor
Dev Team Member

 



Re: Open minded scientists closing threads. So predictable

Too much work. Take two weeks off, Happeh.

When an admin closes a thread because it goes off topic, it does not mean you are supposed to keep it up. Take it elsewhere if you still have a need to discuss it.


----------------
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator

Want to sponsor Hypography? Buy a print in our Fall 2008 Benefit Sale

Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Natural scientists are less likely to believe in God than are social scientists C1ay Theology forum 2 08-15-2005 02:17 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network