evolution = slow, technology = fast

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2005
alxian's Avatar
Explaining

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 583
alxian will become famous soon enoughalxian will become famous soon enough
evolution = slow, technology = fast

first off sorry if its been suggested

basically that it may take a billion or more years to evolve the bodies and population, but only a tiny amount of time for civilization to create highly intelligent cultures.

many documentaries and popular theory tell you that life on this planet took ages to develop.

could that have been due to the time it takes terrestrial life (generally aerobic) migrating from continent to continent?

i.e. this planet allowed for rich pocket of life to evolve and inter polinate while preserving the unique nature of cultures

plus the evolution of intelligence (civilzation and technology) our species only took a very small amount of time. bacially sparked by all the disperate cultures connecting up to each other.

some of the newer documentaries though are saying such evolution of life is very rare and perhaps totally unique to earth.

but if any species reaches as large a population as ours, has access to resources and the ability to exploit them, with communication and ability to manipulate their environment shouldn't take an eye blink for them to attain the same technological enlightenment as humans?

i.e. as long as a planet can harbour several patches of evolved life (that would compete for resources), as long as they didn't use technology to kill themselves off its reasonable that they should evolve very quickly technologically.

it would become a question of what would stall their technological advancement, for humans its war and resource scarcity and silly moral quandries.

not that other beings would be immoral (that would preclude a moral aversion to the natural drive to fight for resources.) but that humans arguably aren't exactly moral creatures by default.


so. evolution takes ages, but technological advancement is extremely fast after the culture becomes stable, be that agrarian or what ever is required to support a billion strong (subjective) society living in one spot or accross the face of a planet.

that once a species (or group of symbiotic) races reaches resource stability civilization is guaranteed.
__________________
don't call me skinny! i'm just ... <<< ... aerodynamic!
its in my initials, an anagram.. seriously!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2005
HydrogenBond's Avatar
Creating

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,968
HydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to all
Re: evolution = slow, technology = fast

The evolution of human consciousness, culture and technology might be a part of a quickening in evolution. If one thinks of it these changes have increased life expectancy and hold the promise of getting better results from the DNA that humans and other lifeforms contain; Culture is learning to evolve the DNA. This positive DNA evolution is no longer a random mutation but is due to directed or orderred interaction by humans and technology. This speeds the whole evolutionary process up.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-16-2005
Guadalupe's Avatar
Questioning

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: EUReKA, U.S.A.
Posts: 208
Guadalupe is infamous around these partsGuadalupe is infamous around these parts
Re: evolution = slow, technology = fast

By definition, “evolution”, is classified as an alien to the natural order of creation. Evolution is not a natural process to where creation can evolve by itself, regardless of the time frame. Evolution, is the invader that alters, the original design of creation, by a process of outside modification.

This may strongly suggest that creation came first.
__________________
The first laws to be documented in the field of Science and Math in the 21st Century: "Law of Time, Energy And Motion & Law of Origin", Copyright © 2002 - 2004 by Guadalupe Guerra. "Law of Creation", Copyright © 2005 by Guadalupe Guerra. "Law of Evolution", Copyright © 2005 by Guadalupe Guerra. "Law of Zero", Copyright © 2006 and "Law of Body in Motion", Copyright © 2006. All Rights Reserved.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-16-2005
Curious

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
SunsetClause is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: evolution = slow, technology = fast

Quote:
Originally Posted by alxian
basically that it may take a billion or more years to evolve the bodies and population, but only a tiny amount of time for civilization to create highly intelligent cultures.
Evolution has stopped for human males or at least we are evolving but for the worst.
There is a sunset clause on the Y chromosome which will lead to male extinction. Future civilizations will be made up of one sex, female. Internal reproduction will be replaced by cloning of females. With cloning evolution will stop as evolution does not happen over the life span of a human and cloning is just an identical copy. Of course this is what I believe but there are a few others who share my beliefs.

Here's some interesting articles that explain the causes but do not give a possible solution for this future problem.
http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/.../trounson.html
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/...ies/s73264.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2005
Thinking

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Potosi, Mo. USA
Posts: 89
Christopher is on a distinguished road
Re: evolution = slow, technology = fast

In Cambrian sea 530 million years ago a the biological singularity occurred suddenly when genetic information reached a critical threshold connected the individual eukaryote cell into complex morphology bringing about cognition.
Just as these cells were connected in the distant past, The technological singularity will occur as the individual human is connected into a cognitive cohesive whole. This whole becoming greater than the sum of its parts.


quote:

catastrophe theory
Mathematical theory developed by René Thom in 1972, in which he showed that the growth of an organism proceeds by a series of gradual changes that are triggered by, and in turn trigger, large-scale changes or ‘catastrophic’ jumps. It also has applications in engineering – for example, the gradual strain on the structure of a bridge that can eventually result in a sudden collapse – and has been extended to economic and psychological events.

Last edited by Christopher; 10-17-2005 at 02:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2005
HydrogenBond's Avatar
Creating

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,968
HydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to allHydrogenBond is a name known to all
Re: evolution = slow, technology = fast

I look at evolution as a movement toward lowering of potential. The formation of stars from a stellar cloud evolved through the natural potential of gravity to create spherical shapes called stars. These shapes lead to fusion. The fusion leads to production of new atoms. These atoms then use natural potentials of nature to form molecules. The background potentials on the early earth led to the natural formation of the soup of life. The changing earth allowed the process to go on further with the evolution of life.

Science has gotten so fixated on genetics and mutations that it seems that something unnatural has somehow overlapped natural forward progress. The DNA template is important but how does the template form itself? The template of atoms, which are the atomic nuclei and orbitals are based on nuclear and EM force. The template of DNA is based on the Hydrogen proton and hydrogen bonding.

If we took away the EM force and the nuclear force, the templates of atoms and molecules would disperse back to sub-particles, i.e, early universe. If will took away gravity the stars would regress back to the original clouds of hydrogen gas. If we take away hydrogen bonding, all life would regress back to the sludgy soup of life. The most abundant material of the universe, i.e., hydrogen, continues to evolve within life and is the potential and orderring principle of life.

One possible theory for such a potential has to do with fusion. When we fuse hydrogen to make other atoms energy is given off due to mass burn. This implies that hydrogen protons are different that all other nuclear protons, in that they contain extra potential. Within the chemistry of life the hydrogen protons are the oldest or the parents of all the atoms and chemicals.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2005
alxian's Avatar
Explaining

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 583
alxian will become famous soon enoughalxian will become famous soon enough
Re: evolution = slow, technology = fast

so what you're saying is a higher power created man, but nature wants only women

that i believe is the strongest argument for creationism, at least the sumerian versionm i've ever heard.

it would explain why so many other mammals reproduce sexually while ancient animals like insect reproduce asexually.

god created man and woman, nature prefers cloning. woohoo



if man takes control of his procreation i do not believe evolution will stop. man can and will prefect his genome. creating supermen an chimera of all flavours. hopefully a federal reserve will stockpile all of our (natural) genetic diversity before it is lost for ever.
__________________
don't call me skinny! i'm just ... <<< ... aerodynamic!
its in my initials, an anagram.. seriously!

Last edited by alxian; 11-18-2005 at 04:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005
Tarantism's Avatar
son et lumire

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In Dark Trees
Posts: 2,044
Tarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to allTarantism is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to Tarantism
Re: evolution = slow, technology = fast

well isnt technology just evolution? in my opinion, a new invention is just someone seeing a need that we didnt naturally develop a solution for, and creationg it. its artificial, yes, but it is making up for what we didnt evolve with (planes fly for us, for example).
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005
goku's Avatar
Explaining

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: poksville,ga.
Posts: 834
goku will become famous soon enoughgoku will become famous soon enough
Re: evolution = slow, technology = fast

if evolution were true then there would be many creatures as intellegent as us.
each one would be totally different from the other, dna, appearance, everything.
__________________
it's a fact, kriptonite is deadly to superman. now scientifically prove it
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005
goku's Avatar
Explaining

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: poksville,ga.
Posts: 834
goku will become famous soon enoughgoku will become famous soon enough
Re: evolution = slow, technology = fast

Quote:
Originally Posted by (((tartanism)))
well isnt technology just evolution?
no, what is the purpose of technology?
all other animals live just fine without it.
technology is another one of the many things that sets us apart from all the other animals.
it is also prof of god. is intelligence natural, no. is intelligence wide spead, no, only humans have it and the means to use it.
notice also that is was the tree of knowledge that adam and eve ate of.
after they ate they began to build.
__________________
it's a fact, kriptonite is deadly to superman. now scientifically prove it
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class? rockytriton Theology forum 235 09-28-2005
Fossil find confirms Kauffman and Progogine self organization. Christopher Biology 54 09-01-2005
A Slow Discussion of Fast Food Buffy The Lounge 37 07-31-2005
Cell Architecture alexander Computer Science 4 04-07-2005

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 66.67%
6 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 11.11%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 11.11%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 0%
0 Votes
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 11.11%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 9
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network