Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Biology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2006   #11 (permalink)
somasimple's Avatar
Thinking


Location:
FRANCE
 
somasimple is on a distinguished road
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nanometer-minded persons in science

Hi All,

Vladimir, I'll second you!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006   #12 (permalink)
Buffy's Avatar
Resident Slayer

Administrator

Location:
Sunnydale, CA
 
Buffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond reputeBuffy has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nanometer-minded persons in science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladimir Matveev
I heard that grant-giving organizations understand the problem but they do not know how to solve it.
Do you? Its kind of a hard problem. There's not enough money, and ideas that have no backing have a much higher likelyhood of failure. Should we put all the money into the wacky ones because they might have a bigger payoff? If we put all the wacky ones in a bucket and say "10% for those ideas" who's to choose? If they're chosen randomly, this is what the people say who *don't* get the money:

"They're biased against new ideas."
Sound familiar?

What would you do?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladimir Matveev
Thanks Buffy for your words: "I hate doing things the conventional way."
I thought I am alone in the Conventional World.
No, but don't think that because someone decides against *one* unconventional idea that there is a "vast conservative-establishment-science conspiracy"...slow progress is not necessarily a bad thing: What if Baron von Frankenstein got a huge government grant for his work? Good idea or bad?

Don't look back, someone might be gaining on you,
Buffy


----------------
"If you do not agree with anything I say, I'll not only retract it, but deny under oath that I ever said it!"
__________________________________________________ ______________-- Tom Lehrer

"No Robbie, not Europe!"


Forum Administrator
Hypography Science Forums - Science for Boys and Girls! Its not for nothing that we hang out here.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2006   #13 (permalink)
Vladimir Matveev's Avatar
Thinking


Location:
St.Petersburg, Russia
 
Vladimir Matveev is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nanometer-minded persons in science

The key problem, I think, is how to replace nanometer-minded persons by broad-minded ones... A narrow thought is a modern kind of brain deficiency. A good specialization is an impenetrable armour for all dim-wits in science. What about this?
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2006   #14 (permalink)
InfiniteNow's Avatar
Suspended


Location:
Austin, TX
 
InfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond reputeInfiniteNow has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Nanometer-minded persons in science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladimir Matveev
The key problem, I think, is how to replace nanometer-minded persons by broad-minded ones... A narrow thought is a modern kind of brain deficiency. A good specialization is an impenetrable armour for all dim-wits in science. What about this?
We need both specialists and generalists... the two compliement one another. Taking one of the two away would leave our society with a large void. Perhaps you could focus on ways to enhance the complimentarity of the two instead of flaming against one or the other.


Cheers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help: The Relation between Science fiction and science Oracle Science Projects and Homework 11 12-25-2008 08:36 PM
How do persons become great? hallenrm Watercooler 15 05-01-2006 05:00 AM
Open minded scientists closing threads. So predictable Happeh Biology 1 08-22-2005 11:06 AM
This Week in Science - online science radio program Marshall Clark Websites 2 07-23-2005 08:44 AM
Current Science Fiction = Future Science Fact? Noah Computer Science and Technology 18 06-09-2004 02:14 PM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:08 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network