Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Biology
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-05-2004   #1 (permalink)
LeeCollins's Avatar
Thinking


 
LeeCollins is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Natural Selection: Who selects?

What is Natural Selection?

Who is the selector in "Natural Selection"? ?


Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004   #2 (permalink)
Freethinker's Avatar
Resident Atheist


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE: Natural Selection: Who selects?

Good question Lee. Or more correctly, TWO good questions.

Natural Selection is simple - "a natural process that results in the survival and reproductive success of individuals or groups best adjusted to their environment and that leads to the perpetuation of genetic qualities best suited to that particular environment" (WWWebster) The problem we run into is one of semantics. "Selection" can be used with or without intentional intellectual decision as part of it's process. I might use intellect to intentionally SELECT which channel to watch on TV. (Though watching TV might be catagorized as not involving intellect!). While an ant might SELECT some chaotically random search pattern to find a food source. A rock rolling down hill may SELECT a path to follow. Hopefully I can be considered to have a higher level of intellect than an ant. We both are intellectually superior to a rock. (Fear Factor watchers aside)

But there is nothing to justify adding "Who" to the discussion. Once a "Who" is added, "Nature" is removed. Plus adding the agent "Who" is rejected by Ockham's Razor.


----------------
Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head



Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004   #3 (permalink)
LeeCollins's Avatar
Thinking


 
LeeCollins is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE: Natural Selection: Who selects?

Quote:
Originally posted by: Freethinker
Good question Lee. Or more correctly, TWO good questions. Natural Selection is simple - "a natural process that results in the survival and reproductive success of individuals or groups best adjusted to their environment and that leads to the perpetuation of genetic qualities best suited to that particular environment" (WWWebster) The problem we run into is one of semantics. "Selection" can be used with or without intentional intellectual decision as part of it's process. I might use intellect to intentionally SELECT which channel to watch on TV. (Though watching TV might be catagorized as not involving intellect!). While an ant might SELECT some chaotically random search pattern to find a food source. A rock rolling down hill may SELECT a path to follow. Hopefully I can be considered to have a higher level of intellect than an ant. We both are intellectually superior to a rock. (Fear Factor watchers aside) But there is nothing to justify adding "Who" to the discussion. Once a "Who" is added, "Nature" is removed. Plus adding the agent "Who" is rejected by Ockham's Razor.
The definition of Natural Selection begins: "a natural process that results in... "
This only describes the result - the result is recognized only after the selection has been made. This give NO insight into WHO (or if you like what) is making the selection.
As your example states YOU can select and an ANT can select (even something that seems chaotic and random). However, a rock can not.

More to the point is:
With the peppered-moths: Unless color change was purely random, the decision was made that is was better for the offspring to change color. Who made this descision?? Who said that it wasNOT better for the peppered moths to die off ?

I don't think you can say: "Plus adding the agent "Who" is rejected by Ockham's Razor."
'Select' is a verb that REQUIRES a noun. For example: "Think" cannot exist on its own - someone must THINK for thinking to get done. I cannot just say thinking was taking place without anyone doing it.

Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004   #4 (permalink)
Tormod's Avatar
Hypographer

Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor
Dev Team Member

Location:
Oslo, Norway
 
Tormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE: Natural Selection: Who selects?

I second FT here: Good question.

But it's a leading question. Why do you assume that a process with a result must begin with a conscious thought? Does that mean that every time snow melts and the water from it flows down a river, that someone decided that "now we need to melt this bit of water"?

If so, where did that process begin? With sunshine? Global warming? Seasonal change? And where does consciousness enter into the equation?

What is your answer to your own question, Lee?


----------------
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator

Want to lose the advertisements? Become a Sponsor!

Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004   #5 (permalink)
LeeCollins's Avatar
Thinking


 
LeeCollins is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE: Natural Selection: Who selects?

Quote:
Originally posted by: Tormod
Does that mean that every time snow melts and the water from it flows down a river, that someone decided that "now we need to melt this bit of water"? If so, where did that process begin? With sunshine? Global warming? Seasonal change? And where does consciousness enter into the equation? What is your answer to your own question, Lee?
The sun is not reacting to anything it will give off whatever heat the season requires. The sun will give off this heat even if there WAS NO SNOW - NO MATTER WHAT. There is NO decision making involved. The heat from the sun melts thesnow. The heat did not arrive because snow needed to be melted. Physics dictates that, given enough heat, frozen water will thaw. This is always.

Now to contrast:
The peppered-moth DOES NOT CHANGE COLORS NO MATTER WHAT. They changed color at a specific time when the color needed to be changed. When this condition was over the peppered-moth returned to its original color.

This is clearly action-reaction. If the condition never arose the moth would never have changed its color. The Sun, on the other hand, HAS NO CONDITION - it is always on. The change in the moths was "turned on" and then "turned off".

This is not the same.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004   #6 (permalink)
Freethinker's Avatar
Resident Atheist


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE: Natural Selection: Who selects?

Quote:
Originally posted by: LeeCollins
The definition of Natural Selection begins: "a natural process that results in... "
Yes and in review it is a poor definition. I have always been told that a def should not use the word itself. You'd think WWWebster would know better!
Quote:
This only describes the result - the result is recognized only after the selection has been made. This give NO insight into WHO (or if you like what) is making the selection.
But here you miss the very well established answer, the WHO or WHAT is NATURE. As in:

NATURAL Selection.

I fail to see any confusion here.
Quote:
As your example states YOU can select and an ANT can select (even something that seems chaotic and random). However, a rock can not.
Yes the rock can. The rock will "select" the path of "least resistance" to it achieving stasis.

Select - " to choose (as by fitness or excellence) ".

As gravity is the force acting on it, it will "choose" which ever path provides the greatest realization of the gravitational pull.
Quote:
More to the point is:
With the peppered-moths: Unless color change was purely random,
The color choices are not nor will they ever be "purely random". The colors available will be limited by genetics and laws of physics. There will be colors and patterns that will not be part of the set of those available to the moth species.
Quote:
the decision was made that is was better for the offspring to change color.
No such decision was ever made. I can just imagine mama and papa moth sitting down and looking thru a book of colors and patterns like choosing a sofa. "I like Muave" says mama, "let's have a gun metal gray son" says papa.
Quote:
Who made this descision?? Who said that it was NOT better for the peppered moths to die off ?
Who decided there should be discussions between peppered moth parents in the first place?

You seem to have a long way to go to understand how Evolution works. This is not surprising. The general population has little factual knowledge about most of Science, even something as basic and simple as Evolution.

Yes peppered moths DO die off. Every single one of them that has ever been born or will ever be born has or will die off. It is a matter of how fast. Some won't make it to a caterpillar stage. Others not past chrysalis. Some will emerge from the chrysalis to become adult moths. Any of these that do not make it not only this far, but even further, to procreation, will not pass ANY genes on. Any mutations off any of these failures will not become part of the future gene pool.

Only those that had sufficient genetic strength to survive to that point (procreation) will be able to pass genes into the future gene pool. If a moth while emerging from the chrysalis is too visible against it's environment, it is more likely to become food for some other creature before it can reproduce. So those with the best ability to blend into the environment will survive the longest and therefore have the most progeny. Thus their genes, the ones with thier best camouflage coloring most prominent will proliferate while those with less advantageous coloring genes will help feed other species rather than procreate.

Natural selection.

If the environment changes, say it gets "dirtier", more gray, less colorful. Then the offsprings that have a tendency to less color will have a better chance of survival till procreation. Thus their genetics will be passed along more and with each generation the numbers of most appropriately colored moths will exist.

No one wrote this down in a Moth Primer and held classes for the caterpillars or emergent moths so they could DECIDE which color to make their offsprings.
<blockquote


----------------
Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head



Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004   #7 (permalink)
Freethinker's Avatar
Resident Atheist


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE: Natural Selection: Who selects?

Quote:
Originally posted by: LeeCollins
Now to contrast:
The peppered-moth DOES NOT CHANGE COLORS NO MATTER WHAT.
This is correct. IT STAYS THE SAME COLOR.

It's progeny might, thru genetic mutation, have different coloring. but the peppered-moth DOES NOT CHANGE COLORS NO MATTER WHAT! (OK, a tagger with a can of spray paint might be around...)
Quote:
They changed color at a specific time when the color needed to be changed.
NO THEY didn't. The peppered-moth DOES NOT CHANGE COLORS NO MATTER WHAT!

It's progeny might, thru genetic mutation, have different coloring. but the peppered-moth DOES NOT CHANGE COLORS NO MATTER WHAT!
Quote:
When this condition was over the peppered-moth returned to its original color.
NO THEY didn't. The peppered-moth DOES NOT CHANGE COLORS NO MATTER WHAT!

It's progeny might, thru genetic mutation, have different coloring. but the peppered-moth DOES NOT CHANGE COLORS NO MATTER WHAT!
Quote:
The change in the moths was "turned on" and then "turned off".
Could you show us where that switch is located on each moth? Is it push button? Toggle?

Every generation has the potential for genetic mutation. Slight variances in size, color, ... any number of DNA coded elements. It is NEVER "turned off". And we are not talking about a single moth here or another over there. But the entire localized species. The entire peppered moth species has ALWAYS been changing. It ALWAYS WILL be changing. Those born with properties that are most advantageous to survival till procreation will pass tendencies to those properties to it's progeny. The average of the peppered moths in a given local will reflect which ever mutations have provided the greatest natural advantage in their local environment. The others will die trying. And die before succesfully procreating.

Thus

Natural Selection.



----------------
Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head



Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004   #8 (permalink)
LeeCollins's Avatar
Thinking


 
LeeCollins is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE: Natural Selection: Who selects?

Quote:
Yes the rock can. The rock will "select" the path of "least resistance" to it achieving stasis.
Select - " to choose (as by fitness or excellence) ".
As gravity is the force acting on it, it will "choose" which ever path provides the greatest realization of the gravitational pull.
I don't believe this. A rock can choose?? That is irrational.
Choose implies "comparing". Of the possible options, a subset is chosen.

Gravitational pull may act upon any physical body with mass. A rock is no exception. If the rock moved down the path of least resistance it is because IT HAD NO CHOICE. It was pulled - not asked.
I can choose to jump into the lake. But if i am pushed, then my choice was taken away.

No inanimate object can choose anything.

Quote:
But here you miss the very well established answer, the WHO or WHAT is NATURE. As in: NATURAL Selection.
What in nature? The dirt, the air, the water what in nature did this. NATURE does not have a brain so how can it choose? If, by NATURE, you mean natural/scientific laws that govern nature then which laws? If natural selection has forces and mechanisms that I am unaware of, please enlighten me.


Quote:
No such decision was ever made. I can just imagine mama and papa moth sitting down and looking thru a book of colors and patterns like choosing a sofa. "I like Muave" says mama, "let's have a gun metal gray son" says papa.
I admitted already that the moths themselves DID NOT CHOOSE!! I said that the choice was made because action was taken. Do you see any cause/effect in this?

Quote:
Who decided there should be discussions between peppered moth parents in the first place?
We did, by choosing to discuss it. No physical law lead us here. I can not see what physical law lead to the color change of the moths.

I say again:
Who made this descision?? Who said that it was NOT better for the peppered moths to die off ?

If Nature does not think then WHO DOES because that is the only entity that can choose.


CHOSE:
v. chose, (chz) cho·sen, (chzn) choos·ing, choos·es
v. tr.
  1. <LI>To select from a number of possible alternatives; decide on and pick out.
    <LI>
    1. <LI type=a>To prefer above others: <CITE>chooses the supermarket over the neighborhood grocery store.</CITE>
      <LI type=a>To determine or decide: <CITE>chose to fly rather than drive.</CITE>

SELECT:
v. se·lect·ed, se·lect·ing, se·lects
v. tr.
<DL>
<DD>To take as a choice from among several; pick out.




</DD></DL>
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004   #9 (permalink)
TeleMad's Avatar
Suspended


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE: Natural Selection: Who selects?

The moths did not change color in response to changes in the environment: what changed was the RATIO of mottled to non-mottled moths. And what did the selecting was birds: they ate more of the moths that were more easily seen.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004   #10 (permalink)
Tormod's Avatar
Hypographer

Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor
Dev Team Member

Location:
Oslo, Norway
 
Tormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
RE: Natural Selection: Who selects?

Quote:
Originally posted by: TeleMad
The moths did not change color in response to changes in the environment: what changed was the RATIO of mottled to non-mottled moths. And what did the selecting was birds: they ate more of the moths that were more easily seen.
Short, simple, and the most likely answer. Evolution in action.


----------------
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator

Want to lose the advertisements? Become a Sponsor!

Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Humans are a 'privileged' evolutionary lineage Tormod Science News 3 04-28-2006 06:54 PM
Natural it is Todesangst Philosophy Forums 29 12-17-2004 11:57 AM
A new kind of Natural number Doron Physics and Mathematics 2 10-17-2003 06:11 AM
ET (Equation Tree) (closed topic-please look in "A new kind of Natural number" topic Doron Physics and Mathematics 0 10-01-2003 10:49 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:01 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network