[ronthepon]

COD4 was really good. Defenitely one of the best tactical shooter like things. Seen STALKER? The chernobyl mission reminded me some.

But COD has it's own tried and tested philosophy or cinematic intensity. Really rewarding, too. Excellent scripting. It can be said that the linear gameplay is it's power.

In the matter or graphics, however, Crysis truly astounded me. I'd still love to get a computer which'll truly run it in all it's glory.

[Grains]

I personally believe that to many games today focus to much just on graphics. I have played plenty of games that are just trying to "show off" their graphics capabilities and the gameplay/story/controls/etc are awful.

Just for the sake of the example I am thinking of now I would like to focus on RPGs. I have enjoyed RPGs for many years. Some of my older favorites include Final Fantasy 1, Final Fantasy 2 (U.S. version). I still find myself going back and playing these games over and over again. When you attach with your fighter he quickly swings his sword or when you cast a spell it is a quick little scene. Today's RPGs if I cast a spell I have tome to go use the bathroom and get a drink before the spell is over (maybe a little but of exaggeration). It is ridiculous. A little effect is good but to often it can be over the top.

I think that is why you see many "timeless classics" who have great games that are still great. Because they have not forgot the first priority, gameplay. Look at Civilization, Warcraft Series, Doom Series, and many others. They still have a great franchises because I believe the focus on the actual gameplay/story first and foremost. I also agree with the replay value theory mentioned by another user earlier.