 |
07-22-2008
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Curious
Location: The Intellecual Puddle of North Idaho
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
I need help learning
Time for me start exercising one of the main reasons I started poking around this place. I need a few suggestions as far as reading material.
I'm currently interested in primarily Cosmology and Particle Physics. I'm getting around well enough, but I'd like some material to start a "from the ground up" understanding of each, basically anything... basic. I've got a little better than high school understanding of algebra and a little less for geometry respectively.
I'm currently trudging my way through Brian Greene's "Fabric of the Cosmos", and Leon Lederman's "The God Particle." Both of which I'm easily understanding, if only for the fortuneate fact that neither one really uses much math and rather leans on imagery.
So my request is simply some novice level literature in these fields. Of course I'm very open to anything else you may feel I would also be interested in by comparison.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
07-23-2008
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Suspended
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: I need help learning
There are lots of good books, but out of the ones I have read, the two that came to mind almost immediately are:
"The Magic Furnace," by Marcus Chown
and
"Blackholes and Timewarps," by Kip Thorne.
Enjoy.

|
|
07-23-2008
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
M.C. Grillmeister

Sponsor |
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: I need help learning
If you haven't read Stephen Hawking's book "A Brief History of Time", I recommend that one. His writing style is very easy to read and he does a good job of simplifying complex concepts.
----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
|
|
07-23-2008
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Creating
Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Book recomendation
I’ll add a recommendation for “Fear of Physics: A Guide for the Perplexed” by Lawrence M. Krauss. Despite the title, it’s not really about fear or perplexity, but more, I’d describe it, a practical account of the role and importance of estimation in all the physical sciences.
----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies 
|
|
07-23-2008
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Suspended
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: I need help learning
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeztar
If you haven't read Stephen Hawking's book "A Brief History of Time", I recommend that one. His writing style is very easy to read and he does a good job of simplifying complex concepts.
|
That is a good one, but a number of the ideas he discusses are out of date. Still a useful read, just something to consider.
FYI - The same applies to my suggestion of Blackholes and Timewarps. 
|
|
07-23-2008
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Creating
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: I need help learning
The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex Murray Gell-Mann
Quote:
|
This is not a book about Quantum Mechanics, nor molecular biology, nor neurobiology. In this book, the great Gell-Mann exposes his ideas of why all subjects of science (from physics, to chemistry, to biology, to psychology) must be studied together, why they are related and also he shows models of how to do this unified study. He defends that reductionism is not the only way of doing science, in opposition of the philosophical ideas of Steven Weinberg and Richard Feynman. This book is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED, because there aren't many books that are against pure reductionism written by reductionism defenders. Gell-Mann is not against reductionism, but against PURE reductionism; he think its nice to explain a complex phenomenon based on the theory of its contents but its also important to study the phenomenon in his actual level, studying the way that the complex works. Not only the simple. Thats the origin of the name: Quark, the simple, and the Jaguar, the complex.
|
----------------
I do not know what I seem to the world, but to myself I appear to have been like a boy playing upon the seashore and diverting myself by now and then finding a smoother pebble or prettier shell than ordinary, while the great ocean of truth lay before me all undiscovered. - Sir Isaac Newton
|
|
07-23-2008
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Suspended
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: I need help learning
Okay... I think I'm a total big dork, but I just finished watching this 8 part discussion, and I'm downright giddy.
You can learn a lot by simply listening to the exchanges of people more brilliant than yourself.
Discussion between Richard Dawkins and Steven Weinberg
Wow, indeed. 
|
|
07-24-2008
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Curious
Location: The Intellecual Puddle of North Idaho
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: I need help learning
Wonderful, thanks so much for the info, these should keep me occupied for a bit, I really appreciate the help, and any help forthcoming.
|
|
07-24-2008
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Creating
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: I need help learning
If you really want to understand modern particle physics, unfortunately you'll have to delve into the math. Geometry and calculus are essentials, I'd recommend Calculus for the Practical Man.
-Will
|
|
07-24-2008
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Dedicated Smart-ass
Location: Just before 0xAA55
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: I need help learning
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by freez
If you haven't read Stephen Hawking's book "A Brief History of Time", I recommend that one. His writing style is very easy to read and he does a good job of simplifying complex concepts.
|
Also recommend that one, as well as his briefer and expandier version: "A Briefer History of Time" (Not a substitute, its good reading though, as it helps with understanding some hard core models in the original book that were rather hard to get, as well as adding current day discoveries to the content of the original book)
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.

|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
» Advertisement |
|
|
|