Science Forums
User Name
Password
Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Chemistry
Become a science forums sponsor today
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2005   #1 (permalink)
Tim_Lou's Avatar
Explaining


 



Wöhler’s urea synthesis

Wohler reacted silver cyanate and ammonium chloride, and he got a white crystal that appeared to be urea.
First time in history, an organic molecule is created from inorganic molecule.
take a look at this website:
http://library.beau.org/gutenberg/etext05/8036210.txt

"Until the year 1828 it was believed that organic substances could only
be formed under the influence of the vital force in the bodies of
animals and plants. It was W?r who proved by the artificial
preparation of urea from inorganic materials that this view could not be
maintained. This discovery has always been considered as one of the most
important contributions to our scientific knowledge. By showing that
ammonium cyanate can become urea by an internal arrangement of its
atoms, without gaining or losing in weight, W?r furnished one of the
first and best examples of isomerism, which helped to demolish the old
view that equality of composition could not coexist in two bodies, A
and B, with differences in their respective physical and chemical
properties."

it was proven that no supernatural energy is needed for the synthesis of organic moleculers, or maybe at least not all of them. Also, it agrees the possibility that living things arose from non-organic matters.


----------------
I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable.

Last edited by Tim_Lou; 01-06-2005 at 08:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2005   #2 (permalink)
Freethinker's Avatar
Resident Atheist


 



Re: Recreation of Wöhler’s urea synthesis

Good going Tim. Thanks for the info


----------------
Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head



Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2005   #3 (permalink)
TINNY's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: Recreation of Wöhler’s urea synthesis

Quote:
and it agrees the possibility that life arose from non-organic matters.
you mean biological life. because i think something alive is one that moves. so inorganic matter has life because it moves.

Quote:
it was proven that no supernatural energy is needed for the synthesis of organic moleculers, and it agrees the possibility that life arose from non-organic matters.
yes. it is a continuous process. I would like to agree that biological life arose from non-organic matter, but you cannot state that just because organic matter is formed from inorganic matter. Some sort of non-sequitur, i think. I guess skinner's operant conditioning is at work here. Little Tim finds it very rewarding when he shows that he equally abhors any supernatural entities as most others, as demonstrated by FT's response. Even when there are flaws, he ignores it. Anything stated by someone on the opposite side is closely scrutinized and ridiculed. And by the way, EM energy is needed for the 'envolution' of matter. Every interaction is through EM energy. So if EM is metaphysical in nature, i have no problem that it is similar to the supernatural energy concept.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2005   #4 (permalink)
Tim_Lou's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: Recreation of Wöhler’s urea synthesis

for what i mean supernatural: from dictionary.com
"Of or relating to existence outside the natural world.
Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces."

so, EM is certainly not violating natural forces, it is well described in many equations.
the website belows gives a ton of information, EM is not something that is considered as unexplainable or supernatural.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism


----------------
I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2005   #5 (permalink)
Tim_Lou's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: Recreation of Wöhler’s urea synthesis

"so inorganic matter has life because it move"
well, i should change my original statement to clarify it a bit.


----------------
I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2005   #6 (permalink)
TINNY's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: Recreation of Wöhler’s urea synthesis

Quote:
Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces
i wouldn't say natural forces. That natural force is metaphysical in itself. You just don't know the true nature of nature.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2005   #7 (permalink)
TINNY's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: Recreation of Wöhler’s urea synthesis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim_Lou
for what i mean supernatural: from dictionary.com
"Of or relating to existence outside the natural world.
Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces."

so, EM is certainly not violating natural forces, it is well described in many equations.
the website belows gives a ton of information, EM is not something that is considered as unexplainable or supernatural.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism
sorry, i meant EM waves. The nature of it as having no mass and no volume, and the constant speed.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005   #8 (permalink)
Tim_Lou's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: Recreation of Wöhler’s urea synthesis

then this statement might be true: "Of or relating to existence outside the natural world.
But not this one: "Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces."
EM is one of the 4 natural forces...


----------------
I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005   #9 (permalink)
TINNY's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: Recreation of Wöhler’s urea synthesis

tim, read EMW, not EM
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
urea as dye Tim_Lou Chemistry 13 12-17-2004 03:32 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network