| | #11 (permalink) | |
| Explaining | Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ? Not really: Uut = Ununtrium, element 113 284113Uut --> 279111Uuu + 42He (1196 milliseconds) 1196 milliseconds! which is 1.196 seconds. from http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Uut/key.html ---------------- I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable. | |
| ||
| | #12 (permalink) | |
| Explaining | Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ? at least their half-lives are higher than that of muons: 2.2 microseconds wait... its measured in microseconds.... so it would be 2.2 * 10^ -3 milliseconds from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon charged pions' are even worse! 2.6 × 10−5 milliseconds from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion ---------------- I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable. Last edited by Tim_Lou; 01-14-2005 at 02:22 PM. | |
| ||
| | #13 (permalink) | ||
| Understanding | Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ? Quote:
The only real benefit is to increase our understanding of how atoms are put together, but we already have good knowledge of many, and it still hasn't helped much. I am going to be a heretic here (but then ain't I always?). I think particle physics has got just about all the useful data it is going to get. What we need is not more exotic atoms, or higher energy particles, but somebody bright enough to put all the clues together and come up with a solution. There are computers powerful enough to deduce the properties of particles and atoms IF they were programed with a complete and accurate description of the fundamental forces involved. Something binds protons and neutrons together to form atoms. I see no reason why that binding force should be any more complicated, in terms of its fundamental nature, than gravity or electromagnetism. It is just complex in operation. | ||
| |||
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Explaining | Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ? yeah, there is no commerical purpose... the amount of element produced is so limited. anyway, it will be cool to see a new period on the periodic table... in period 8th, the electrons might fill the sublevel s, then.... will period 8 have p sublevel? or is the electron gonna fill the f, d or....hmmm, the answer will come once the scientists hit period 8 ![]() ---------------- I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable. | |
| ||
| | #15 (permalink) | |||
| Explaining | Quote:
would get farther than 684 or feet ! Can this be comercially harnessed. If I knew, I'd be doing it. If you don't consider, then nothing will get discovered. Quote:
they are creating these new round discoveries. The scientist are speaking about an island around 130. Of course I must admit that many years earlier when 105 was found, it was thought that the island would be around 118. Still have to look, don't we ? ![]() Maddog | |||
| ||||
| | #16 (permalink) | ||
| Explaining | Quote:
convention ? Maddog | ||
| |||
| | #17 (permalink) | |
| Explaining | Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ? it has to go through the IUPAC first. website: http://www.iupac.org/index_to.html I agree, these names are in fact weird... hard to memorize. They should just assign them like A, B, C, Aa, Ab, Ac... but the problem is that some european countries might not want em in english. ---------------- I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable. | |
| ||
| | #18 (permalink) | |
| Curious | Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ? We talked about this in our science class in September of 2004 a manmade element created by Japanese scientist was created. They tried to create this element by using a cyclotron to attack the atoms of bismuth, number 83 with the atoms of zinc numbered 30. By using the cyclotron they were successful in creating the new element after 80 days of attacking and the new element disintegrated in 0.3 of a millisecond. This new element whose atomic number is 113 is the heaviest known element and may possibly be named “japonium.” It has a mass number of 278 with 113 protons and 165 neutrons in its nucleus. You can find out more from: Kyodo World News Service 09-28-2004 | |
| ||
| | #19 (permalink) | ||
| Hypographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ? Quote:
![]() ---------------- Your Friendly Neighborhood AdministratorWant to sponsor Hypography? Buy a print in our Fall 2008 Benefit Sale Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. - Carl Sagan | ||
| |||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Space in 2004 | Stargazer | Space News | 3 | 08-13-2006 10:40 PM |
| What do you think is the best technological advance of 2004. | alexander | Computer Science | 35 | 04-29-2005 04:50 PM |
| Chemistry Highlights 2004 | alexander | Chemistry | 9 | 02-21-2005 08:35 PM |
| Technology Research Advances of 2004 | Aki | Computer Science | 6 | 01-04-2005 10:47 AM |
| The World Earthquake Prediction for 2004 | Richter | Physics and Mathematics | 3 | 09-05-2004 09:51 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:00 AM.








wait... its measured in microseconds.... so it would be 










