Science Forums
User Name
Password
Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Chemistry
Become a science forums sponsor today
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2005   #11 (permalink)
Tim_Lou's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

Not really: Uut = Ununtrium, element 113
284113Uut --> 279111Uuu + 42He (1196 milliseconds)

1196 milliseconds! which is 1.196 seconds.
from http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Uut/key.html


----------------
I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2005   #12 (permalink)
Tim_Lou's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

at least their half-lives are higher than that of muons:
2.2 microseconds wait... its measured in microseconds.... so it would be
2.2 * 10^ -3 milliseconds
from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon

charged pions' are even worse!
2.6 × 10−5 milliseconds
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion


----------------
I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable.

Last edited by Tim_Lou; 01-14-2005 at 02:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2005   #13 (permalink)
BlameTheEx's Avatar
Understanding


 



Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim_Lou
Not really: Uut = Ununtrium, element 113
284113Uut --> 279111Uuu + 42He (1196 milliseconds)

1196 milliseconds! which is 1.196 seconds.
from http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Uut/key.html
Wow! More than a second! But still, where are the commercial properties? It is far too short lived to be used in chemistry. Too short lived to be used as a nuclear fuel.

The only real benefit is to increase our understanding of how atoms are put together, but we already have good knowledge of many, and it still hasn't helped much.

I am going to be a heretic here (but then ain't I always?). I think particle physics has got just about all the useful data it is going to get. What we need is not more exotic atoms, or higher energy particles, but somebody bright enough to put all the clues together and come up with a solution.

There are computers powerful enough to deduce the properties of particles and atoms IF they were programed with a complete and accurate description of the fundamental forces involved.

Something binds protons and neutrons together to form atoms. I see no reason why that binding force should be any more complicated, in terms of its fundamental nature, than gravity or electromagnetism. It is just complex in operation.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2005   #14 (permalink)
Tim_Lou's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

yeah, there is no commerical purpose... the amount of element produced is so limited.

anyway, it will be cool to see a new period on the periodic table...

in period 8th, the electrons might fill the sublevel s, then.... will period 8 have p sublevel? or is the electron gonna fill the f, d or....hmmm, the answer will come once the scientists hit period 8


----------------
I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2005   #15 (permalink)
maddog's Avatar
Explaining


 



Wink Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlameTheEx
Do you really expect to time dilate atoms into usefulness? So milliseconds are stretched to 10's of milliseconds. But to what end?
Muons are create from upper atmosphere by cosmic rays. If it wern't for time dilation they
would get farther than 684 or feet ! Can this be comercially harnessed. If I knew, I'd be
doing it. If you don't consider, then nothing will get discovered.


Quote:
Originally Posted by BlameTheEx
A hope that is vanishingly small. If they could exist, we would have them by now
You seem to have out of date info or your looking at the glass half empty. I just read how
they are creating these new round discoveries. The scientist are speaking about an island
around 130. Of course I must admit that many years earlier when 105 was found, it was
thought that the island would be around 118. Still have to look, don't we ?

Maddog
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2005   #16 (permalink)
maddog's Avatar
Explaining


 



Arrow Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim_Lou
Not really: Uut = Ununtrium, element 113
284113Uut --> 279111Uuu + 42He (1196 milliseconds)

1196 milliseconds! which is 1.196 seconds.
from http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Uut/key.html
I noticed those names on the website. Can't they come up with better temporary naming
convention ?

Maddog
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2005   #17 (permalink)
Tim_Lou's Avatar
Explaining


 



Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

it has to go through the IUPAC first.
website: http://www.iupac.org/index_to.html
I agree, these names are in fact weird... hard to memorize. They should just assign them like A, B, C, Aa, Ab, Ac... but the problem is that some european countries might not want em in english.


----------------
I have mistaken, apologized, and taken the consequences. My only regret, was for how I was bothered by the unchangable.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005   #18 (permalink)
wesil's Avatar
Curious


 
wesil is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

We talked about this in our science class in September of 2004 a manmade element created by Japanese scientist was created. They tried to create this element by using a cyclotron to attack the atoms of bismuth, number 83 with the atoms of zinc numbered 30. By using the cyclotron they were successful in creating the new element after 80 days of attacking and the new element disintegrated in 0.3 of a millisecond. This new element whose atomic number is 113 is the heaviest known element and may possibly be named “japonium.” It has a mass number of 278 with 113 protons and 165 neutrons in its nucleus.

You can find out more from: Kyodo World News Service 09-28-2004
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005   #19 (permalink)
Tormod's Avatar
Hypographer

Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor
Dev Team Member

 



Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by maddog
I noticed those names on the website. Can't they come up with better temporary naming
convention ?
I'd suggest Sha-la-la-lium, or Springsteenium.


----------------
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator

Want to sponsor Hypography? Buy a print in our Fall 2008 Benefit Sale

Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005   #20 (permalink)
maddog's Avatar
Explaining


 



Lightbulb Re: 2 new elments discovered in 2004 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tormod
I'd suggest Sha-la-la-lium, or Springsteenium.
How about Zappafium in honor of Frank Zappa..
Maybe Rushium, Ledzepplinium, Claptonium, Aerosmithium, & so forth...

Maddog
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space in 2004 Stargazer Space News 3 08-13-2006 10:40 PM
What do you think is the best technological advance of 2004. alexander Computer Science 35 04-29-2005 04:50 PM
Chemistry Highlights 2004 alexander Chemistry 9 02-21-2005 08:35 PM
Technology Research Advances of 2004 Aki Computer Science 6 01-04-2005 10:47 AM
The World Earthquake Prediction for 2004 Richter Physics and Mathematics 3 09-05-2004 09:51 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:00 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network