Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Chemistry
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-03-2005   #11 (permalink)
UncleAl's Avatar
Creating


Location:
Southern California, USA
 
UncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond reputeUncleAl has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

Organic chemistry is life; everything else is waiting. Explanations of biological homochirality's origin are poor at best (read: pathetic),

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41(24) 4619 (2002)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41(7) 1139 (2002)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39(22) 4033 (2000)
Chem. Phys. Chem. 2(7) 409 (2001)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 84(17) 3811 (2000)

Quantitative geometric chirality is rigorously defned by mathematican Michel Petitjean, including its calculation in QCM software,

Petitjean, Michel, J. Math. Phys. 43(8) 4147 (2002)
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itowe...eware.html#QCM

It's a truly nasty field to study as pure math,

http://www.mdpi.net/entropy/papers/e5030271.pdf
Review of quantitative geometric chirality

As long as you are in homogeneous isotropic solution, an organiker's view is good enough for an organiker(e.g., ORD spectroscopy) even though it has little rigor and is seriously wrong at its edges,

J. Mol. Phys. 43(6) 1395 (1981)
J. Appl. Cryst. 19 108 (1986)
J. Chem. Phys. 65(4) 1522 (1976)

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38 3418 (1999)
Chem. Rev. 98(7) 2391 (1998)
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108 5539 (1986)
Nature 405(6789) 932 (2000)


----------------
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005   #12 (permalink)
TeleMad's Avatar
Suspended


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleAl
Organic chemistry is life; everything else is waiting.
No, biochemistry is life. Organic chemistry, unlike biochemistry, includes a great deal that's not found in living organisms.
Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005   #13 (permalink)
FREYA021's Avatar
Thinking


 
FREYA021 is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

organic chemistry is vocabulary to biocemistry... IT IS WHAT WE R!!! ORGANIC


----------------
"...the most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "eureka!" but "that's funny"..." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2005   #14 (permalink)
TeleMad's Avatar
Suspended


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FREYA021
organic chemistry is vocabulary to biocemistry... IT IS WHAT WE R!!! ORGANIC
Lexan polycarbonate and a ton of other compounds, including dozens of amino acids, are organic, but they're not (naturally) found in living organisms.

Biochemistry ... IT IS WHAT WE ARE!!!!

Last edited by TeleMad; 03-04-2005 at 05:01 PM..
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005   #15 (permalink)
FREYA021's Avatar
Thinking


 
FREYA021 is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

amono acids not found in organisms???? do u know what u wrote?...
and hello! u need to be the best organicher if u tend to become biochemist, scientific one, more chem less biology with is describleble science, not exact as chemsitry, math or phisics
ps if u dont know other living forms it doesnt mean that they dont exsist


----------------
"...the most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "eureka!" but "that's funny"..." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005   #16 (permalink)
Tormod's Avatar
Hypographer

Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor
Dev Team Member

Location:
Oslo, Norway
 
Tormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond reputeTormod has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FREYA021
amono acids not found in organisms???? do u know what u wrote?
The question is, did you read what he wrote?


----------------
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator

Want to lose the advertisements? Become a Sponsor!

Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005   #17 (permalink)
FREYA021's Avatar
Thinking


 
FREYA021 is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

it is typo and u know it! ty


----------------
"...the most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "eureka!" but "that's funny"..." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005   #18 (permalink)
TeleMad's Avatar
Suspended


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

Quote:
Telemad: Lexan polycarbonate and a ton of other compounds, including dozens of amino acids, are organic, but they're not (naturally) found in living organisms.
Quote:
FREYA021: amono acids not found in organisms???? do u know what u wrote?...
Why yes, I do.

The real question is, do you not know that there are dozens of amino acids that are not found in living organisms?

Let’s do some simple math. There are 20 ‘universal’ amino acids (and one or two other less common ones, such as selenocysteine) used during protein synthesis. But the following quote explicitly states that there are many more amino acids than these.

Quote:
“The Murchison meteorite, which fell near a small town in Australia in 1969, contains at least seventy-four amino acids, including eight or more of the twenty amino acids that make up proteins in organisms on earth.” (Jeffrey L. Bada, Cold Start. (Origins of Life on Earth), The Sciences, May-June 1995 v35 n3 p21(5))
So sticking with the 74 amino acids from the quote, that would leave about 50 amino acids not (naturally) found in living organisms.
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005   #19 (permalink)
FREYA021's Avatar
Thinking


 
FREYA021 is an unknown quantity at this point
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

yea yea and pigs could fly! oink oink
have u heard of combination? permutation? and r amino acids question of organic or biochemistry?
and by the work of E.Fisher amino acids r the result of destiction of proteins in flora and fauna; they have COOH and amino group so can COMBINE! and on an on so u have polipeptids...
what they may found is maybe strange combination, but it is organic... remember what i said earlier IF U DONT KNOW OTHER LIVING ( read organic) FORMS IT DOESNT MEAN THEY DONT EXSIST


----------------
"...the most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "eureka!" but "that's funny"..." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2005   #20 (permalink)
TeleMad's Avatar
Suspended


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: new chemist :)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FREYA021
yea yea and pigs could fly! oink oink
So you are so stubborn as to reject straightforward logic and science. I was right, you were wrong. Live with it.

Quote:
FREYA021: and r amino acids question of organic or biochemistry?
Those found in living organisms are in the realm of biochemistry and organic chemistry; those not found in living organisms are in the realm of organic chemistry only.

As before, biochemistry can be though of as the subset of organic chemsitry that deals with life. The chemistry of life is found in that subset, whereas much chemistry not of life is found outside the biochemistry subset of organic chemistry. Get it yet? Are you familiar with subsets?

Quote:
FREYA021: and by the work of E.Fisher amino acids r the result of destiction of proteins in flora and fauna;
If that's what he actually said, then he's wrong: or more accurately, his statements would be incomplete.

Amino acids are also formed abiotically: we've found them in meteorites, for example, and Stanley Miller produced them by passing electric discharges through a strongly-reduced gas 'atmosphere' (that supposedly modeled the prebiotic Earth's).

So no, amino acids are not only found in the proteins of flora and fauna. Stating that they are is a false statement.

Quote:
FREYA021: what they may found is maybe strange combination, but it is organic... remember what i said earlier IF U DONT KNOW OTHER LIVING ( read organic) FORMS IT DOESNT MEAN THEY DONT EXSIST
A better statement is, JUST BECAUSE YOUR IMAGINATION CAN RUN WILD AND YOU CAN FABRICATE SOME HYPOTHETICAL LIFE FORM UNLIKE ANYTHING WE KNOW OF DOESN'T MEAN IT DOES EXIST.

Last edited by TeleMad; 03-05-2005 at 10:56 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network