Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Chemistry
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-19-2008   #1 (permalink)
Nitack's Avatar
Understanding


Location:
Washington DC
 
Nitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
“Kanzius Effect” RF-induced flame from saltwater

Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008   #2 (permalink)
Turtle's Avatar
Percipient

Platinum Subscription
Sponsor

 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Arrow Re: Great Science at YouTube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitack View Post
Uhmmm...that's cool and everything, but there is far more energy being used to generate the radio waves than the burning salt water is releasing. While this may have small scale specific applications where efficiency isn't important, this is no fuel source any more than the inumerable claims out there of running internal combustion engines on water. If it looks too good to be true, it is.


----------------
semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008   #3 (permalink)
Nitack's Avatar
Understanding


Location:
Washington DC
 
Nitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Great Science at YouTube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle View Post
Uhmmm...that's cool and everything, but there is far more energy being used to generate the radio waves than the burning salt water is releasing. While this may have small scale specific applications where efficiency isn't important, this is no fuel source any more than the inumerable claims out there of running internal combustion engines on water. If it looks too good to be true, it is.
I never claimed that it could violate the laws of thermodynamics. I just think it is fricking cool!

How about this though... The main issue we have with the hydrogen economy is the lack of an efficient way to separate the constituent atoms in water. This process causes the oxygen and hydrogen to split, what if it is more efficient than electrolysis?
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008   #4 (permalink)
Turtle's Avatar
Percipient

Platinum Subscription
Sponsor

 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Arrow Re: Great Science at YouTube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitack View Post
I never claimed that it could violate the laws of thermodynamics. I just think it is fricking cool!

How about this though... The main issue we have with the hydrogen economy is the lack of an efficient way to separate the constituent atoms in water. This process causes the oxygen and hydrogen to split, what if it is more efficient than electrolysis?
If it was more efficient, that would be dandy, but given all the heat losses in the radio equipment I don't see it as likely. This guys process is electrolysis.


----------------
semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008   #5 (permalink)
Nitack's Avatar
Understanding


Location:
Washington DC
 
Nitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Great Science at YouTube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle View Post
If it was more efficient, that would be dandy, but given all the heat losses in the radio equipment I don't see it as likely. This guys process is electrolysis.
His process only uses radio waves, electrolysis by definition requires that an electric current be passed through the water you are separating. Maybe splitting hairs, but radio waves ≠ electrical current. Different forms of energy.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008   #6 (permalink)
Turtle's Avatar
Percipient

Platinum Subscription
Sponsor

 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Arrow Re: Great Science at YouTube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitack View Post
His process only uses radio waves, electrolysis by definition requires that an electric current be passed through the water you are separating. Maybe splitting hairs, but radio waves ≠ electrical current. Different forms of energy.
Point well taken. Nonetheless, he is putting in more energy than he is getting out, as all such schemes must do. The Devil always gets his due.


----------------
semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008   #7 (permalink)
Nitack's Avatar
Understanding


Location:
Washington DC
 
Nitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Great Science at YouTube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle View Post
Point well taken. Nonetheless, he is putting in more energy than he is getting out, as all such schemes must do. The Devil always gets his due.
Ah, but how much more is he putting in, that is the relevant question.

Also, it only works with salt water, what is the role of the salt in the process?
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008   #8 (permalink)
Turtle's Avatar
Percipient

Platinum Subscription
Sponsor

 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Arrow Re: Great Science at YouTube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitack View Post
Ah, but how much more is he putting in, that is the relevant question.

Also, it only works with salt water, what is the role of the salt in the process?
Judging by size of his equipment, I'd say a lot more.

Not sure on the salt, but I'm guessing it acts as a conductor just as in 'standard' electrolysis. From my own experiments using salt in the electrolyte, there is a lot of gunge left behind. Granted much of it comes from the electrodes which his system lacks, but I'd like to see a trial where the vial is run dry & examine what's left.

There is no end of Hydrogen-themed videos at YouTube; some great, some not so much. It's all misguided in my view, insofar as they mean to fuel vehicles with the gas. With electric cars using capacitors instead of batteries, it is a waste to use electricity to make Hydrogen to put in a fuel cell or tank.

What I'd like to see on YouTube from these folks is the bloopers when things go wrong.


----------------
semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008   #9 (permalink)
Nitack's Avatar
Understanding


Location:
Washington DC
 
Nitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud ofNitack has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Great Science at YouTube

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle View Post
Judging by size of his equipment, I'd say a lot more.
Does the size of the equipment you use correlate to energy requirements?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle View Post
Not sure on the salt, but I'm guessing it acts as a conductor just as in 'standard' electrolysis. From my own experiments using salt in the electrolyte, there is a lot of gunge left behind. Granted much of it comes from the electrodes which his system lacks, but I'd like to see a trial where the vial is run dry & examine what's left.

There is no end of Hydrogen-themed videos at YouTube; some great, some not so much. It's all misguided in my view, insofar as they mean to fuel vehicles with the gas. With electric cars using capacitors instead of batteries, it is a waste to use electricity to make Hydrogen to put in a fuel cell or tank.
I think you are actually missing a wonderful opportunity that hydrogen affords. What is the main argument against 100% solar energy? It only works half of the time because the sun goes down. However, if you are able to produce enough electricity to account for all of your needs (day and night) during those sunny hours, you can use that excess electricity to split hydrogen out of water to be used when the sun is not out. Hydrogen offers the opportunity to store your solar energy with out the need for expensive (not to mention toxic) batteries.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle View Post
What I'd like to see on YouTube from these folks is the bloopers when things go wrong.
I would pay to see that
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008   #10 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
Creating

Moderator

Location:
U.S. Midwest
 
modest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Great Science at YouTube

I don't think that's a hydrogen flame. The color of the flame is yellow - exactly what you'd expect burning sodium metal to look like. Hydrogen burns clear. The fact that it needs salt would support that something is happening with the sodium.

That's really interesting. Would anyone mind if I split this into the chemistry forum?

~modest


----------------
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
chemistry, electrolysis, kanzius effect, radio


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Risperdal-induced Non-stop Persistent Eyelid-twitching - My Healing Experience ntuc Medical Science 37 10-09-2009 12:08 AM
First out-of-body experience induced in laboratory setting C1ay Science News 9 09-22-2007 01:42 AM
endothermic flame??? pigeon_soup Chemistry 9 05-06-2007 03:25 AM
Paranoia's flame paigetheoracle Philosophy Forums 0 07-11-2006 01:48 AM
Zero-G Flame Jay-qu Physics and Mathematics 2 04-12-2005 07:08 AM

» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network