Science Forums
User Name
Password
Science Social Network
home    members    help/rules    who is online    contact   

Go Back   Science Forums > Physical Sciences Forums > Chemistry
Become a science forums sponsor today
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-02-2006   #1 (permalink)
Crow_of_Darkness's Avatar
Curious


 
Crow_of_Darkness is an unknown quantity at this point
 



A question about Nuclear pollution

Hello all, its my first post and i believe i writte in the correct place. If not please remove it.

So here is the question. Suppose we have two Nuclear devises of equal power. The first explodes 300 metres over the surfase and the other many miles away, in the surface of the ground. Which bomb, will be responsible for the bigger pollution? Why? I have hear that this that will explode on the surface, will be responsible for about 10 times bigger pollution. Is this true? Why? Please explain. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2006   #2 (permalink)
UncleAl's Avatar
Creating


 



Re: A question about Nuclear pollution

Fission products from a fission warhead are a given quantity. An air burst disperses the stuff through a tremendous volume of air over a tremendous surface area below before it hits the ground. The fission products are largely short-lived beta- and gamma-emitters. Delay to exposure is good. The solution to pollution is dilution.

A ground burst mixes fission products with a huge mass of pulverized dirt which then dumps down. Rapid, concentrated, and nasty if you are under it.

The dirtiest bomb is a three-stage hydrgen bomb. A dozen kilos of fissile material is the trigger for the fusion stage. The fusion stage is quite clean aside from its plutonium carrot detonator. Excess fast neutrons, lots of them, fission the U-238 bomb case. A big H-bomb is a uranium burner of essentially unlimited size. The fission product fallout is immense, even for air bursts.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz3.pdf


----------------
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006   #3 (permalink)
ronthepon's Avatar
Creating


 



Re: A question about Nuclear pollution

So, as I understand it, nuclear bombs blown on the surface cause more pollution because it contaminates the surface soil?
Did I get that right?


----------------
ronthepon, capitals avoided.
And don't ask me why.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006   #4 (permalink)
Mercedes Benzene's Avatar
Medicinal Chemist

Hypography Staff Member
Moderator
Editor

 



Re: A question about Nuclear pollution

I suppose it really depends on what you consider to be the most damaging "form" of pollution. A bomb detonated above the surface would definitely cause more immediate damage from radioisotopes... at least to people and other "terranean" organisms. An underground detonation would cause more long term damage if the fission products penetrated underground wells and aquifers. Also, nearby crops and other flora would be greatly affected... that is if they survived the blast... haha
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nuclear Energy? Safe or No Way! Racoon Chemistry 54 05-18-2006 10:48 AM
China's Serious Pollution Problem chenyu Medical Science 5 12-12-2005 03:50 AM
Nuclear Half life matrixscarface Physics and Mathematics 5 03-02-2005 07:02 PM
Disposing of nuclear waste infamous Watercooler 10 02-26-2005 09:04 PM
Nuclear fission Stargazer Space 4 12-14-2004 01:43 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network