problem is that they constantly change so much stuff, the fixed code they had for the xp kernel is no longer useful in vista. If they were to stay with an expandable kernel that will get better with releases, they would have a much better product all together. I don't have a problem with windows, its a lot of work that goes into it, my main problem is with microsoft policy and methods of selling, more then anything else. But yeah it's like they finally get one product to stable release quality, and they overhaul the whole thing and release an alpha-quality product yet again.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by laurie
You cannot prevent people from clicking on things they shouldn't
|
that's what guns are for
but no, in all reality, i don't think that that is what buffy meant to say anyways.
you can educate people on not clicking random stuff, but even then accidents will happen. but if you match it with a protection suite and firewall rules and other security precautions, you will eliminate the risk of that click causing damage by that much more.
btw in today's world, clicking hyper links will give away passwords, and upload your browser cache to remote servers. but if you have systems to detect such activity, you will be that much more protected
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
