here's my way of doing it:
dispatch-conf
so, um 8 lines vs 1, i win
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
thats because one, you dont have dispatch conf installed, two you dont have a distro with a package management system therefore you can't install dispatch-conf as far as i can remember its a portage util...
:P pbttt
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
nope, I do, because i did not have to write a script and it does loads of stuff then blindfully replace stuff in config files, so pbttt I have a more powerful tool that i didnt have to write, and it is one line per execution, and therefore i win.
Actually have a patch for it that makes dispatch-conf a lot more powerful, friend wrote it, allows you to do real cool stuff...
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
that would be quite ok, work-wise i win, but still its a nifty script for people to read through
whoever said that bash isnt powerful, must be a fanatic of Bill Gates
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
another cool tool is pf(which i prefer to iptables, but iptables is all we got in linux ) and snort, also dont forget nmap and ettercap(if netcat is "the swiss army knife" of network security then ettercap is a swiss army knife that makes you coffee in the morning, fixes your car and builds your house for you)
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.