 |
11-15-2004
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Dedicated Smart-ass
Location:
Just before 0xAA55
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
What is your favorite Linux window manager?
What is your favorite Linux window manager and why?
Ok, I'll start...
My favorite is Blackbox, an xorg based fully customizable yet very small in size window manager, actually very similar to Fluxbox but its a bit smaller.
Also other cool one that i've been playing around with is Metisse, french project, a window manager that alows you to do anything you want with your window in 3 dimensions (from rotation to real transparency to zoom), much like looking glass, but it doesnt run off of Java which i totally dispise, and it doesnt require a new and unstable Java machine and itself is less than 5 megs, quick compile and is a part of portage = stable.
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
 |
|
|
11-15-2004
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Dedicated Smart-ass
Location:
Just before 0xAA55
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
RE: What is your favorite Linux window manager?
Actually, the other week got sick of the normal Windows look and downloaded StyleXP, then went to themexp.org, downloaded and installed OSX Style, Icons, Boot and Login screen, moved some stuff around, hid all the icons on the toolbar, got rid of quick-launch, time and language bars to make it look Macish, changed the properties of ObjectDock to silver and 60% transparent and it now looks really OSXish; if you want a screenshot, please post.
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
|
|
|
|
11-15-2004
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Hypographer
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
RE: What is your favorite Linux window manager?
I'd like a screenshot. I've been a bit wary about downloading StyleXP - is it any good? I heard about Litestep, too, but it seems a bit too far out for my tastes.
----------------
 Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator
Want to lose the advertisements? Become a Sponsor!
Join our Facebook group or follow us on Twitter
Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
11-17-2004
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Dedicated Smart-ass
Location:
Just before 0xAA55
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
RE: What is your favorite Linux window manager?
Its good, you just have to spend a little time trying to find a package that works, but its pretty easy to use, I'll try to post a screeshot whenever i get out to Windows, which i might by the end of the day...
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
|
|
|
|
11-17-2004
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Dedicated Smart-ass
Location:
Just before 0xAA55
|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
What is your favorite Linux window manager?
here is a screenshot:
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
» Advertisement |
|
|
|
