Current Science Fiction = Future Science Fact?

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2002
Questioning

Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 113
Noah is an unknown quantity at this point
Current Science Fiction = Future Science Fact?

What do ya'll think? Will we ever develop technology like on Star Trek and Star Wars? I saw an article in Popular Science a while ago that showed disigns scientist have for a warp drive, and the awesome thing was that a lot of them were VERY similar to what they "use" on Star Trek. But if they will work, who knows?

Noah
__________________
Noah Moses

"And, when he shall die, take him and cut him out in little stars, and he will make the face of heaven so fine that all the world will be in love with night, and pay no worship to the garish sun."--William Shakespeare
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2002
Curious

Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4
Mallory Knox is an unknown quantity at this point
Some things yes, some things no. Spaceships/deep space travel? Probably. Holodecks? Maybe. Replicators/transporters? Probably not.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2002
Tormod's Avatar
Hypographer
Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor
Dev Team Member

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 12,910
Blog Entries: 4
Tormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant futureTormod has a brilliant future
As for the transporters, recent research has shown that teleportation - at least on a quantum level - may be possible. Which doesn't mean we'll soon be zipping aorund the universe, but it is a promising idea.

http://www.hypography.com/topics/teleportation.cfm

Tormod
__________________
Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator

Want to sponsor Hypography? Buy a print in our Fall 2008 Benefit Sale

Found a problem? Report it in our Bug Tracker

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2002
Questioning

Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 113
Noah is an unknown quantity at this point
Yes, just the other day they said they had been able to "transport" a beam of light. The head guy over this research needs to change his name to Scotty

Noah
__________________
Noah Moses

"And, when he shall die, take him and cut him out in little stars, and he will make the face of heaven so fine that all the world will be in love with night, and pay no worship to the garish sun."--William Shakespeare
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2002
Curious

Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5
Evalain88 is an unknown quantity at this point
I have one question :
If they can transport a bean -----they could transport a person with average mass= 1000 the mass of the bean with about 100 000 000 times more powerful "ray" or whatever it is. In this case the transfer in seconds could be posiblly about 1 000 000 000 times the bean time transfer for about 10 m right? How are the scientists going to deal with time? They could lose the person......he may never come back! As the amount of time of being (no where) increases so does the risk. Don't you all think?
Thank you
Regards to all
Eva H.I.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2002
Questioning

Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 113
Noah is an unknown quantity at this point
Yes, and another problem brought up about "transporters" is the energy they produce. If you transform an entire human into energy, you will have a MASSIVE amount of energy to deal with. But who knows what time and technology will bring us.

Noah
__________________
Noah Moses

"And, when he shall die, take him and cut him out in little stars, and he will make the face of heaven so fine that all the world will be in love with night, and pay no worship to the garish sun."--William Shakespeare
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2002
Curious

Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5
Evalain88 is an unknown quantity at this point
Yeah I agree.....if the person is transfered into energy and the experiment doesn't complete because it will be dense(there's no disagreement on that). You never know how dense a human could be as some form of energy. And another problem occurs--brain affection or never resolving back in normal shape. There could be brain....body,blood mostly(radiation), affections. There could be fatal damages. What I sugest is high electronic technics and instead of turning into energy the person,we turn a machine into energy form that could transfer him/her very easly and fast without damaging any part of the body in any way. I think it's safer.
But it all depends on Physics and Chemistry and math and if they all combined we could fix something up. It could be posible. But we have to include the time as major trouble maker in such experiment.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2002
UncleAl's Avatar
Creating

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 1,042
UncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of lightUncleAl is a glorious beacon of light
Current Science Fiction = Future Science Fact?

It is a remarkable but verifiable fact that mankind is wholly incapable of predicting its future - through its priests, its madmen, its laity, or its scientists. No stated vision of the future has ever come true. Whether it is an HP calculator killing the slide rule, CDs killing licorice pizzas, PCR and recombinant DNA, the Soviet implosion, or the Net and e-mail remaking the whole of First World civilization... nobody saw it coming. Nobody.

Science fiction exists to expose defective futures, thereby rendering them impossible. Imagine everything you can. The future lies huddled in the untouched residue, precisely like the very last entity remaining after Pandora opened the damned box. NASA hasn't got a chance.
__________________
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-09-2002
Curious

Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 4
Kelddath is an unknown quantity at this point
Current Science Fiction = Future Science Fact?

Hmmmh, what about Jules Verne for instance, didn't he predict a submarine, a trip to the moon(OK, we didn't actualy use a cannon, but ok), then a hot air baloon and a lot more things that were thought to be a sci-fi. Then, if you look at Da Vinci(helicopter, parashoot,...).

Modern sci-fi(cyberpunk, neocyberpunk) talks about things that are not so far away, and you could easily draw paralels with the things that already exist. Star trek(star wars) is more a pop sci-fi, then anything else, made for masses, but still there are few things that are not so sci-fi anymore:
teleporter - Hmmm, didn't "we" already teleport a photon?
Phasor beam - paralel with a laser beam, that we use in mining to surgery(nothing special actually)
Holodeck - A mix of computer games and VR(huh i can't wait to play Baldurs gate VIII in holodeck)

k.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-09-2002
Questioning

Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 113
Noah is an unknown quantity at this point
Current Science Fiction = Future Science Fact?

Doing a little more reading, some say it's not quite that simple.

1. Teleporter-It is said that we will have problems with anything over the atomic level, and no way we could transport a human.

2. Phaser Beam-If it is a "laser beam", then yes, we already have it. But you could be dodging it like you see on TV.

3. Holodeck. One problem is making a light projection solid. In ST. it says it uses a magnetic contament field to hold the photons in, but light is not affected by a magnetic field.

But that does not mean that we really won't figure out a way to do these things. It would be nice if we did, hopefully in my lifetime
__________________
Noah Moses

"And, when he shall die, take him and cut him out in little stars, and he will make the face of heaven so fine that all the world will be in love with night, and pay no worship to the garish sun."--William Shakespeare
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help: The Relation between Science fiction and science Oracle Science Projects and Homework 5 11-23-2005
Science fiction writing contest Stargazer Space 0 12-13-2004

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 63.64%
7 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 9.09%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 9.09%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 9.09%
1 Vote
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 9.09%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network