Solar antenna invented

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2004
Understanding

Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 331
BlameTheEx is on a distinguished road
RE: Solar antenna invented

Freethinker

"A receiving "antenna" is a device for ACCUMLATING and perhaps secondarily CONVERTING energy"

Sadly it is the converting part that is the problem. Until you connect some sort of electronics to an antenna it is just an accumulator. There is no suitable electronics, not even a rectifier, available. In this situation the antenna is no more than an alternative to lenses or filters.

Should somebody invent something (presumably a large molecule) that can directly use the output from the antenna, things will be much more exciting. To emphasise the relative difficulty of this....

A group of scientist in communist Russia were given 5 years to turn cow shit into butter. After 2 1/2 years they were asked for a progress report. They replied "well we are half way there. It still tastes like shit, but it spreads like butter."
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2004
Freethinker's Avatar
Resident Atheist

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,057
Freethinker is a jewel in the roughFreethinker is a jewel in the roughFreethinker is a jewel in the roughFreethinker is a jewel in the rough
RE: Solar antenna invented

Quote:
Originally posted by: BlameTheEx
Sadly it is the converting part that is the problem. Until you connect some sort of electronics to an antenna it is just an accumulator. There is no suitable electronics, not even a rectifier, available.
Actually information could be transmitted using simple binar. A string of photons for a given duration would indicate a "ON" state, or binary "1". A rectifier would only be needed as a detector for analog decoding. And even that isn't needed in PCM.
Quote:
In this situation the antenna is no more than an alternative to lenses or filters.
Perhaps, but as an advancement over existing options.
Half full?
__________________
Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head



Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2004
Understanding

Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 331
BlameTheEx is on a distinguished road
RE: Solar antenna invented

Freethinke.

Could you elaborate a tad? How do expect to transmit or receive information without any electronics?

Half full? Er, no. The glass is barely damp.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2004
Freethinker's Avatar
Resident Atheist

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,057
Freethinker is a jewel in the roughFreethinker is a jewel in the roughFreethinker is a jewel in the roughFreethinker is a jewel in the rough
RE: Solar antenna invented

Quote:
Originally posted by: BlameTheEx
Could you elaborate a tad? How do expect to transmit or receive information without any electronics?

Half full? Er, no. The glass is barely damp.
Ah see, one of the big differences. I see the glass as always full. It's just a matter of with what?

As to the antenna, the article states
Quote:
The light excites miniature electrical currents
Which specifies that no other electronics are needed to produce the electrical current. Even if the frequency of this current is too high to pass thru current electrical devices, binary states can be. By producing pulses of appropriate duty cycles, data can be transmitted. A simple digital PCM design can decode the data based only on digital (on/ off) state of the pulses.

This would not allow for maximum utilization of the spectrum by any means. But because of the pilot/ carrier freq being in the light spectrum the duty cycle could be such that the data rate would still be extremely high.
__________________
Thanks for helping to get god pounded into my head



Another succesful faith based initiative. Just like 9/11
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Link found between solar activity, global climate Tormod Astronomy news 0 12-22-2004
Solar power to Jupiter BlameTheEx Space 5 06-01-2004
solar radiation rileyj Astronomy and Cosmology 5 04-14-2004
Solar Eclipse Tormod Astronomy and Cosmology 1 06-01-2003
Things you didn't know about the Solar System Tormod Astronomy and Cosmology 2 12-16-2002

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 63.64%
7 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 9.09%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 9.09%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 9.09%
1 Vote
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 9.09%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network