bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2005
Suspended

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: bear lake (in tha boonies)
Posts: 11
masonswanson is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to masonswanson Send a message via MSN to masonswanson
Cool bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

hey i was watching tv the other day and saw something about this but had to leave half way through it so if you know anything about these little guys then would you please tell me something?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2005
lindagarrette's Avatar
Explaining

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland Heights, MO
Posts: 865
lindagarrette is a jewel in the roughlindagarrette is a jewel in the roughlindagarrette is a jewel in the roughlindagarrette is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via ICQ to lindagarrette
Re: bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

You must be referreing to the microbes living in the tiniest of gaps in deep granitic and basaltic formations. They metabolize hydrogen. Here is a reference site with a lot of other good stuff, too. .http://www.resa.net/nasa/otherextreme.htm
__________________
If god existed then science would be meaningless
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2005
C1ay's Avatar
¿42?
Hypography Staff Member
Administrator
Senior Editor
Editor

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 33.78N 84.66W
Posts: 5,756
C1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant futureC1ay has a brilliant future
Re: bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

Quote:
Originally Posted by masonswanson
hey i was watching tv the other day and saw something about this but had to leave half way through it so if you know anything about these little guys then would you please tell me something?
These sound like the kind of organisms that could bring life to one planet from another by surviving the rigors of intergalatic travel. Is this how life began on Earth?
__________________
Clay

Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
Add yourself to Hypography's Frappr.
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2005
Thinking

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Outback Australia
Posts: 73
dagaz is on a distinguished road
Re: bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

Quote:
Originally Posted by C1ay
These sound like the kind of organisms that could bring life to one planet from another by surviving the rigors of intergalatic travel. Is this how life began on Earth?
This is one of two main theories as to how life began, the life-from-space theory as originally put forward by Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe. Many of the tenets of the theory, as it was originally put forward, have now been discredited.

The second theory, the chemosynthetic origins of life theory, was given strong impetus by the experiments of Urey and Miller in the 1950's which used conditions similar to those thought to be prevailing on the prebiotic Earth to produce amino acids and other organic molecules.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2005
alxian's Avatar
Explaining

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 583
alxian will become famous soon enoughalxian will become famous soon enough
Re: bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

i'd asked some high energy astronomers about this type of life form and they said that the extrasolar planets we're finding may already be dead, but these creatures are hardy enough and well sheltered enough that as long as enough gases and solvent pass through their habitat that they could survive for quite a while longer than life on the surface

i was speculating that even if the core stopped spinning and the mantle cooled you'd still have energy potential in the form of radioactive deposits.. i passed this by michael and he said its possible but these would be the most extreme of extremophiles given the toxicity of radioactive isotopes. i'm thinking if life had enough time to evolve and had few sources of energy left it might be possible for bacteria (or possibly larger organisms) to absorb the isotopes and metabolize them, the energy potential would be massive if they could convert it naturally (nature nuclear fission) in a sped up decay process.. it would require energy storage methods exceeding what known life is capable of and a hardy dna structure not to mention high radiation tolerances.

imagine a planet swiss cheesed with bacterial columns originating from a uranium deposit, life funneling and recycling nuclear energy naturally. very unlikely but good for fiction
__________________
don't call me skinny! i'm just ... <<< ... aerodynamic!
its in my initials, an anagram.. seriously!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2005
TeleMad's Avatar
Suspended

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,249
TeleMad is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

Quote:
Originally Posted by dagaz
This is one of two main theories as to how life began, the life-from-space theory as originally put forward by Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe.
The life-from-space theory is called panspermia, and dates back to the 19th century (long time before Hoyle). Svante Arrhenius is one of the scientists who proposed it.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2005
Turtle's Avatar
Pasquinader
Latest blog: Meh
Platinum Subscription
Sponsor
Re: bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

___Rock eating bacteris I understand is now thought largely responsible for cave formation, as opposed to the leaching acid rain/water hypothesis. I think I heard they excrete sulfuric acid?
__________________
Nemo me impune lacesset. ~Unattested
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2005
alxian's Avatar
Explaining

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 583
alxian will become famous soon enoughalxian will become famous soon enough
Re: bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

yes they do, meaning that sulphure sucking bacteria and their buddies down in the ocean depths can exist in very toxic environments, life can control almost all compounds in nature.. i'm wondering if their could be a super creature capable of tackling all known toxins and if their are any trully toxic compounds no life form can actually deal with.
__________________
don't call me skinny! i'm just ... <<< ... aerodynamic!
its in my initials, an anagram.. seriously!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2005
bumab's Avatar
Local Brewmaster

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: intellegencia [sic]
Posts: 1,007
bumab is on a distinguished road
Re: bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

Quote:
Originally Posted by alxian
i'm wondering if their could be a super creature capable of tackling all known toxins and if their are any trully toxic compounds no life form can actually deal with.
i've thought about that too... i'd have to say a very high radiative level would probably knock out most things, through sheer damage to DNA. there'd have to be incredible DNA repairing protiens just to deal with the little amounts of radiation cockroaches have withstood. anything much higher, and i think most life would be toast...
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2005
Fishteacher73's Avatar
Coincidence of Molecules

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 1,646
Fishteacher73 has a spectacular aura aboutFishteacher73 has a spectacular aura aboutFishteacher73 has a spectacular aura about
Re: bacteria that eat rock and need no oxygen

There are actually bacteria found living in barrels of radio-active wastes, others that use plutnium and other radio-active elements.

It is theorized that the bacteria in the sub-soil actually out number (in both numbers and bio-mass) that life at the surface. One estimate would cover the surface of the Earth to a depth of about 5 feet of single celled organisms...
__________________
Don't walk behind me; I may not lead. Don't walk in front of me; I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my friend.
Albert Camus
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Current Poll
Favorite James Bond?
Sean Connery - 63.64%
7 Votes
George Lazenby - 0%
0 Votes
David Niven - 9.09%
1 Vote
Roger Moore - 9.09%
1 Vote
Timothy Dalton - 9.09%
1 Vote
Pierce Brosnan - 0%
0 Votes
Daniel Craig - 9.09%
1 Vote
Hate 'em all - 0%
0 Votes
Who's James Bond? - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network